amitbudhwar
New member
Meri bhi sun lo....
Are bhai, there is no clear process. Also politics, regionalism etc play a big part of decision making. Countries like US hold trials between several good players to select the best, no matter who won the quota for the country. In our country sports organisations run by politicians etc who have vested interests. On top of that poor infrastructure, lack of good training and coaching, poor diet practices etc add further obstructions. Even when we talk about most popular sports in India(Cricket), training and infrastructure is still an issue. Not many stadiums, training facilities available for such a huge population. Yes India has produced really good players but overall India's cricket performance abroad has been abysmal. India never dominated like Australia or West Indies. India knows the problem of bouncy tracks but still very less work on weakness. India did not produce reputable fast bowlers either, which again boils down to physique and available infrastructure.
Overall India lacks a lot in terms of Infrastructure, good training, good access to facilities, high nutrition diet etc. Red tape and too much bureaucracy,lack of funding, politics, lack of professionalism in the sports organisations etc are the major bottlenecks. Yes sports culture also matter but that said, India needs to do a lot in the above said areas.
Some man's loss is another man's gain. It may be corruption for you, but for MC Mary Kom supporters it is neat and clean process. You don't confine yourself to Haryana only. There is corruption, because a Haryanvi Pinki Jangda couldn't go to the world championships but there is no neat and clean process if another Haryanvi Sonia Lather won silver there. There is corruption because Sushil Kumar is being denied a trial, but there is no neat and clean process if he was given a chance to win medals in Olympics twice. It is a biased mindset.
As far as Indian cricket team is concerned, India is among strong cricketing nations, 2 time ODI world champions, 1 time T20 world champions, 2 time ICC champions trophy winner. Only world titles matter most. In current players Virat Kohli and MS Dhoni are really world class. Best in world.
Are bhai, there is no clear process. Also politics, regionalism etc play a big part of decision making. Countries like US hold trials between several good players to select the best, no matter who won the quota for the country. In our country sports organisations run by politicians etc who have vested interests. On top of that poor infrastructure, lack of good training and coaching, poor diet practices etc add further obstructions. Even when we talk about most popular sports in India(Cricket), training and infrastructure is still an issue. Not many stadiums, training facilities available for such a huge population. Yes India has produced really good players but overall India's cricket performance abroad has been abysmal. India never dominated like Australia or West Indies. India knows the problem of bouncy tracks but still very less work on weakness. India did not produce reputable fast bowlers either, which again boils down to physique and available infrastructure.
Overall India lacks a lot in terms of Infrastructure, good training, good access to facilities, high nutrition diet etc. Red tape and too much bureaucracy,lack of funding, politics, lack of professionalism in the sports organisations etc are the major bottlenecks. Yes sports culture also matter but that said, India needs to do a lot in the above said areas.