Are they exploding bombs in Delhi, Calcuta, Mumbai or your city? Are they frightening common people? No, not at all. Everybody who is firing a gun is not a terrorist. Please get your definition right.
I think you first need to fix your definitions. You seem to be trying to justify the Murder of others for the sake of your ideology or belief. I don't think there is much difference between jedahi terrorists and ideologist terrorist (It is just for your comfort, I call both of them terrorist.). For me it does not matter if I want to brand a person who terrorise metropolitan cities a terrorist and a person who murders government school teachers and employees in rural areas as superhero like you. In my opinion both are terrorists.
What has been written is about the policy of the government and the causes of the conflict. It seems you have not spent time and energy in trying to know the reality of the other side. Just to a search on Google and you will find lots of reports.
An article from the expert in the field (Anthropologist at Yale University) was recently published in a respectable paper. You can look at it here http://epaper.hindustantimes.com/ArticleText.aspx?article=20_04_2010_014_008&mode=undefined.
You may also have a look at another article recently published in outlook
http://www.outlookindia.com/article.aspx?265019.
What you hear in TV and all is propaganda of the Government, giving you just one side of the story.
You can judge this by comparing what you have been told about the Maoist attack on April 6th in TV and what is told by this story http://www.outlookindia.com/article.aspx?265013. I have reason to believe that the later is closer to the truth.
So the last report from you clearly suggest that Maoists are barberic and inhuman murderers and not the revolutionaries. You have the reason to believe that the story is true, but you seem to be brainwahsed enough that you dont treat the poor CRPF soldiers as humans.
The life and hardship faced by Maoist is much more difficult than that of the farmers you have seen. What evidence and reasoning do you have that these adivasis are not as honest as a farmer? Think about it. Sometimes it gets tempting to write anything that comes to one's mind without applying logic.
The Maoists are not the adivasis, but they are brainwashed adivasis, who are killing their fellow tribesman, if they don't pay them their facilitaion fee. They kill government teachers and employees, who go their to help those tribesman. They only allow people like Arundhati Roy, who work for their agendas. So, who would have sympathy with a terrorist, how does it matter if a murderer is honest or not. You yourself seem to be keen on pushing your agenda without convincing logic.
Oh! Looks like you still have to wake up to the reality. Few months back, there was a report in newspapers that said there are more than 10 thousand people in jails without even a trial, some of these have been there for more than 10 years. Put yourself in their shoes for a movement and then tell me where the justice is?
I had recently been to the Delhi high court for a case related to Triveni Infrastructure builders, there, a couple in their 60s, who had come all the way from Chandigarh, narrated their story. The couple wanted to buy a house for their divorced daughter for which they had paid 40 lacs to the builder four years ago but haven't got anything in return. From last one year, they have been running pillar to post for getting their money back. Similar was the story of numerous other people. The case is an anticipatory bail application 1641/2009, you can go through the judgments (available online through internet) and then tell me whether justice is being done.
Do one thing, ask your relatives, your friends and your neighbors and then tell, how many of them have actually used the many avenues for seeking justice and how many of them were satisfied by the experience?
Every system has it limitation, its flaws and this is one of the things we need to improve in our system. But how do you justify murdering of you neighbour, just because somebody else mitreated you. Nonsense!!!!
If you want to have a generic system for billions of people, no system can fit in an ideal manner. The case you suggested is for people with grey background, what about the communist system you are justifying, which murdered demonstartors openly, none of whom was criminal?
Do you call the genocide of the tribal's that the government is doing a savvy? The Maoists are right in defending themselves and that right is theirs by virtue of being alive. The Government or anyone has no power to takeaway that right. They want to live respectfully, if only the greed of few who are using their power in government allows them.
This is the sensational information I have recieved from you that Government of India is involved in the Genocide of Indian Tribals. Why don't you start a news channel?
Each and every human being has a right to defend himself, so the Maoists also have. But what about the people (mind you I am stating people, because they kill tribals, government employees and paramilitary forces), who are killed by Maoists? I am treating your opinion to be that they dont have any rights, because they dont support Maoists, in their fight for a communist India.
Tell me why is there an insurgency in every corner of the democratic country? It was in Punjab, it's in Kashmir, it's in north east and it's spread out in the heart of country. So tell me how is this country a democratic when more than half of the people are fighting against the government?
So, can you give me the exact number of Indians who are fighting against the Government? You seem to be suggesting more than 50%. Then how come 60% people come to vote?
I think you should mind your logic first and then speak. And for your kind intimation, let me tell you that rural India votes more than the urban India.
The democracy that you are talking is just a virtual democracy? Tell me do people vote to the right candidate or are they forced to vote for a compromise candidate? Tell, me which of the MP's or MLA's who represented your area were the real choice of the people?
An honest candidate has no standing today, and people are forced to vote for a corrupt candidate year after year even when their corruption had been widely known.
The democracy that we are living in today is a democracy of corruption. And if we continue to be remain in this illusion of democracy, the days are not far when you and I would also be fighting against someone's greed, like the comrades, one day.
Democracy is all about each and every participant, the compromise candidates are indication of the pattern of people voting. Start voting for good people, you will get good candidates. Start supporting murderers and terrorists, you will be able to create a mess around your homes.
You just seem to be keen to suggest the problem, can you tell me the solution. Is a communist system without such problems? NO.
Communist system has also given leaders like Stalin, who were corrupt, autocratic, and destructive.
The same comrades are also part of the same democratic system. They are governing West Bengal for last 40 years and that was the place where al this unrest started.
) but with the little knowledge I have I still believe in what I just said above. But I welcome you to educate me further and help me change my views. 
...