Don’t brand Naxalism as a fight of communism vs socialism vs capitalism. Dig deeper. Naxalism is a symptom of a much bigger disease. Naxalism is a social problem. Unless we accepts this truth, the problem will continue. Even the Govt doesn’t call them terrorist they say its law and order problem. Some wise man in the Govt said "its not my area" It’s the individual state's problem.This is active in 16 of India’s 28 states !! Force is not a solution to any problem be it from state or be it from those opposing the state. But as mentioned by a few others they have no option left but to support the moasist. Instead of looking into the reasons and factors which produced Naxalism, we take it as a rebel movement and advocate to curb it through force.
Just check the names of maoists in the news - Khobad Gandhi, Koteshwar Rao, ML Rao, Prasanta Bose, Kisanji who comes on TV with a ghoonghat, Nakul Yadav, Arun Thomas Ferreira and I can name many more. The thing which is striking is - NOT ONE OF THESE JOKERS IS AN ADIVASI. Number two, Maoist terrorists need some justification for public consumption (or propaganda) to keep their lallu panju 'revolution' going and general populace, which might not be in the know, thinks a genuine uprising has taken place amongst tribal folks - which is a fake charade for commies to mask their own terrorism.
Vipin, I am just trying to interpret the two posts together. You seem to be suggesting that it is a social problem, which has come into the prominance due to ignorance of some specific sections of society. I am ready to agree to that provided the movement was lead by tribal leaders. I am ready to agree to that provided they had worked to social, educational or economic development of the tribals. I am ready to agree had they only been opposing suppressing state departments.
What I find is that their agenda is decided in Delhi and Kolkata, by the people who visit tribal area only for a paid holiday. They are lead by people who are from well to do families or from educated middle class families. I see no tribal leader in their top leadership. They have been dominating those area for years now, and still they are socially, educationally and economically backwards. They not only kill the paramilitary forces (so called suppressors), but they also kill government teachers, and social workers who don't sell their agenda.
Now you can decide if Naxalism is a fight of communism vs democracy or a social problem. Atleast for me its a law and order problem caused by people with propaganda to make our democratic system weaker and weaker.
According to ShankkerAiyar, "Each of the 80 worst Naxal affected districts have no schools, poor heath care, exploitative feudalism, no employment opportunities, pathetic social infrastructure". Over three lakh villages have no road connectivity. For example Dantewada district of Chhattisgarh is on the list of 100 worst districts list for the past two decades. So despite well aware of the reasons that are behind the rise of Naxalism Indian government is only depending upon force to end that problem. It is paying no heed to the problems that gave rise to Naxalism. In fact in the mind of Indian administration Naxalism is a war that has to be tackled through force. It most of the time forgot that Naxals are alienated Indian citizens and once their grievances will overcome Naxal movement will come to an end. Decades of total neglect of local tribal masses by various governments in welfare schemes and governments failure to work out a proper plan for the social and economic development of tribal have nurtured Maoism.
You know why these areas have the problem. Not because government does not want to build infrastructure, but to survive the Naxal leaders dont want the development reach these places. They have created an anarchical system, where only might is right and anybody can take advantage of being strong. Its not that the neglect has caused these area to become weaker and weaker, but the anarchy caused by Naxals has lead them into a hole.
Had government not willing to spend on infrastructure, it would not have done so in other areas as well. Why is that only the Naxal affected areas are lackin in development? The plain reason for me is that the anarchy has caused people from going and working there. That means disconnect from the mainstream.
The 2006 status report on Naxalism made it clear that the government should address the problem in a holistic manner. That include "political security, development and public perception management fronts"
So you agree that the government is willing to tackle the social issues. What about the Naxals? They seem to be provoking a sovereign country with their useless demands.
A report suggest 200 districts out of 600 are under Naxalite rule (in those affected areas). They rule there because the people in these places support them in a majority and believe in them; because the Naxalites give them food, money and land snatched from the rich land owners and exploiters. Naxlites do kill when these rich protest; and at times are involved in atrocities as well.
So, you mean that these 200 districts are the most advanced districts in India, since they are rules by Naxals by people's wish. Why are you staying in the underdeveloped suppressive India? If they actually rule with people's consent in one third of India, why don't they just go ahead and get their people elected in Parliament?
I am nut sure what is driving you to find such fascinating facts, which I can only treat as your communist fantasy. This is the way communists have been working all over. The top leadership will befool their subordinates in such a way that they think that the only thing their superiors can do is to benefit them. Instead, they make their fortunes, and run away with all the prize. Stalin did the same to Russia, Kim is doing the same in South Korea, Castro is doing the same in Cuba, Chavez is doing in Venezuela. None of them made their people stronger, none of them made their nations stronger. They were/are all individual fanatics, who worked for power, money and autocracy.
However no denying in the fact that there may be a few 'idiots' who will always try to take advantage of this for their political gains. And they are no better than those who took advantage of Indira Gandhi killing and tortured(killled) Sikhs, who took advantage of hindu-muslim riots or those who take advantage of babri or any other mushjid. These sort of people can be found everywhere on both sides.
Then why don't you think that we can work to make the existing system better without voilence, by better participation in democracy, by voting for better people, by working honestly.
A doctor described this situation as " Suppose a person has weak immune system and every month he suffer from flu and cold. His doctor thought flu is the problem and was giving medicines to cure that but in fact the problem is the weaker immune system and once that is cured the other one will go itself otherwise we may get rid of flu temporarily but surely it will come back again". Make sense Jitender bhai?
Do you think that every time you have flu and cold you should take medicince for curing the weak immune system.
I agree that if we have identified that the immune system is weak, then we need to cure the weak immune system, but the flu and cold also need to be taken care of. Right .. ?