Which MAHABHARTA character is most liked by you and why?

Status
Not open for further replies.
vijay said:
Now you are discussing. :)

No doubt Bheeshma was so strong and could have killed Pandavas. If you get more into the character of Bheeshma you will see that he was so tired of supporting of injustice. He felt guilty of doing some things which he should not had done but for the sake of his loyality to throne he somehow did that.

Even Duryodhana had doubts on Bheeshma’s loyality in the battlefield and that’s why Bheeshma took a vow that he would kill atleast 10,000 ‘enemies’ per day to make sure that he was fighting with all his worth. And he did that bravely till 10th day of war ( the day he was laid down on arrow-bed by Arjuna ).

For Bheeshma, both Kaurava’s and Pandava’s were his sons and when the war used to stopped at evening. They used to talk together. According to Bheeshma, Duryodhana was wrong and Pandavs were right inspite of his loyality to the throne. He himself declared that his body is bound to secure Hastinapur but his mind is of his own and he can not lie. Krishna knows that and all that happenend. You can blame Krishna for using his tactics to win the war but can not blame Bheeshma for a foul play.
Click to expand...



What type of injustice????......please explain...if u read the story of Mahabharat, u will find thr r many flaws in that. If Kauravas were doing injustice, arent not the Pandavas.

Pandavas played gamble on thier wife. Is it right?
They themselves r responsible for vanvaas and living life below royal status. or will u blame Duryodhana for this???
They agree to burn thier owns sons live in Lakshgrha so as to confuse Kauravas. Is it right???
Kunti never disclosed the fact that Karan was his son. Is she right?
Karan was never allowed to fight with Arjun on pretext of his being to a lower class, though he was not. Is it right to put casteism in front inspite of his courage. A true fighter never does this. Is Arjun a real fighter????

Is Duryodhan to be blamed for all this????

Nothing is right or wrong in this world. it is just how one presumes it. He feels so, but is it really true???...:confused:
 
chandra16 said:
I wish Duryodhan was born in place of Yudhishtra. He would have surely become the king and fulfilled his the only wish :)
Click to expand...

And I wish I was actually born in that era and compromised with their situation :)

Welll its not about the wish but our point of view about an epic....Besides none of them ended up being happy......Pandavs lost all their sons and Kauravs of course were killed.... right ??
 
amritameerut01 said:
Pandavas played gamble on thier wife. Is it right?
They themselves r responsible for vanvaas and living life below royal status. or will u blame Duryodhana for this???
Click to expand...

How that harmed Duryodhana ? Instead it helped Duryodhana to insult her. Nobody says that it was right. Gamble was not illegal in those times but putting human as a bet was certainly wrong. And yes using foul method to win a gamble was definitely WRONG.


amritameerut01 said:
They agree to burn thier owns sons live in Lakshgrha so as to confuse Kauravas. Is it right???
Click to expand...

WHAT ?????
Are you sure that at that time any of the five brothers were married ????
Where from they got their OWN sons ?
Please enlighten me :)

amritameerut01 said:
Karan was never allowed to fight with Arjun on pretext of his being to a lower class, though he was not. Is it right to put casteism in front inspite of his courage. A true fighter never does this. Is Arjun a real fighter????
Click to expand...

Karna was not allowed to show his archary skills only ( but not fighting skills ) in an official function of the Hastinapur where ONLY Kuru Princes were supposed to participate. Nothing wrong in that.

If you talking about the fight between Karna and Arjuna, they did fight many time face to face and each and every time Karna ran away.

If you have read whole Mahabharta then let me know when and where Karna and Arjuna were face to face.
It's a quiz for you ? Answer it or ask me if you don't know.
 
Last edited:
discussion kuchh jyada hi lamba ho gya hai....us time par sab apne hissab se theek hai...aaj bhi wahi sab character hai bas thoda roop badal gya hai......sab ke sab grey....no balck or white...so itni bahas ki jarurat nahi hai...kisi ne thoda dhoka kiya ..kisi ne jyada ....jab dono taraf se galtiya ho to fir ye nahi dekha jata ki kiski kam hai aur kiski jyada...
mere liye to duryodhan sabse sahi tha ...usne galat kaam bhi kiye to kah kar kiye...kisi ko chhpkar dhoka nahi diya ..jaisa ki Yudhistar,Krishna ya aur kayi sare aise hi charcters ne kiya... jisse ummid ho galat kaam ki wo kare to koi nayi baat ki par seedha-saadha dikhne wala kare to jyada bura hota hai....
 
Last edited:
keshavdahiya said:
And I wish I was actually born in that era and compromised with their situation :)

Welll its not about the wish but our point of view about an epic....Besides none of them ended up being happy......Pandavs lost all their sons and Kauravs of course were killed.... right ??
Click to expand...

No wonder to some extent I agree with you. I did not wish for the sake of making my point being accepted by everyone. I used the term wish because even after putting my sincere efforts, somewhere I was not able to make you understand the actual fact. Much before the Mahabharat started it was known that its not going to have a happy end because it was "Dharam Yudh". Pitamah, Vidhur tried hard to stop the same but it happned because of Krishna and Dhritrashtra.
 
Baat te sahi se aapki bhi per karan bhi ek bada reason tha is udh ke peechhey....
chandra16 said:
No wonder to some extent I agree with you. I did not wish for the sake of making my point being accepted by everyone. I used the term wish because even after putting my sincere efforts, somewhere I was not able to make you understand the actual fact. Much before the Mahabharat started it was known that its not going to have a happy end because it was "Dharam Yudh". Pitamah, Vidhur tried hard to stop the same but it happned because of Krishna and Dhritrashtra.
Click to expand...
 
chandra16 said:
No wonder to some extent I agree with you. I did not wish for the sake of making my point being accepted by everyone. I used the term wish because even after putting my sincere efforts, somewhere I was not able to make you understand the actual fact. Much before the Mahabharat started it was known that its not going to have a happy end because it was "Dharam Yudh". Pitamah, Vidhur tried hard to stop the same but it happned because of Krishna and Dhritrashtra.
Click to expand...


To be very honest all these facts are based on the written transcripts somewhere....and I think we forgot "SHAKUNII" mama.....without whose contribution nothing wud have made any sense...... the war and all ??
But then again plz dont hold any grudges if you were not able to make me understand certain facts.....I am a poopphead and stubborn at time.....and Do/understand what my gut feeling tells me, based on facts what I have enlisted right in front of me !!
 
Absolutely rit...shakuni te asli JAD tha is yudh ki....
keshavdahiya said:
To be very honest all these facts are based on the written transcripts somewhere....and I think we forgot "SHAKUNII" mama.....without whose contribution nothing wud have made any sense...... the war and all ??
But then again plz dont hold any grudges if you were not able to make me understand certain facts.....I am a poopphead and stubborn at time.....and Do/understand what my gut feeling tells me, based on facts what I have enlisted right in front of me !!
Click to expand...
 
Dear Friends Ram Ram,
when I was a Teenager I used to hate Yudhister , in Mahabharata because of his Non-Quality character except he was only the prince and I used to think Duryodhan should be the King but later I realized ,He got the most amazing quality which non other had.The quality of speaking truth in any circumstance . He spoke truth all in his lifetime that means he surely was the sinless , Reliable, Non-Corrupt etc.
Yudhister is my fav.
 
मन्ने तै भीम पसंद सै.... लाम्बा-ठाढा अर्र ताकतवर ....सुण्या सै उसके बगाए होड़ हाथी इब्ब ताई धरती पै उल्टे न पड़ लिए....उप्पर अन्तरिक्ष मै हांडे सें कित्ते :D:p
 
Un te sabte badhiya te arjun tha....Kai byah karwa gaya tha...:p
sunitahooda said:
मन्ने तै भीम पसंद सै.... लाम्बा-ठाढा अर्र ताकतवर ....सुण्या सै उसके बगाए होड़ हाथी इब्ब ताई धरती पै उल्टे न पड़ लिए....उप्पर अन्तरिक्ष मै हांडे सें कित्ते :d:d
Click to expand...
 
amritameerut01 said:
what type of injustice????......please explain...if u read the story of mahabharat, u will find thr r many flaws in that. If kauravas were doing injustice, arent not the pandavas.

Pandavas played gamble on thier wife. Is it right?
They themselves r responsible for vanvaas and living life below royal status. Or will u blame duryodhana for this???
they agree to burn thier owns sons live in lakshgrha so as to confuse kauravas. Is it right???
kunti never disclosed the fact that karan was his son. Is she right?
Karan was never allowed to fight with arjun on pretext of his being to a lower class, though he was not. Is it right to put casteism in front inspite of his courage. A true fighter never does this. Is arjun a real fighter????

Is duryodhan to be blamed for all this????

Nothing is right or wrong in this world. It is just how one presumes it. He feels so, but is it really true???...:confused:
Click to expand...

आहा!
जाटलैंड कितना भाग्यशाली है.वर्तमान काल में साकशत विद्वान संजय(पुनर्जनम में मेरा पूरण विश्वास है) महाभारत का आँखों देखा विवरण पर्स्तुत कर रहे हैं.ये जीवन सही में फेयर और उचित पड़ने लगा है.इस धागे को पेटेंट करवा लेना उचित होगा नहीं तो कोई भी बाहरी शक्ति फिर से तथ्यों को इतने सच्चे तरीके से अपने नाम करवा लेगी.बी. R चोपडा को भी इसकी पार्टी भेजने की व्यस्था की जाये.
 
dndeswal said:
.


  • मनुष्य की आयु अधिक से अधिक 400 साल और कम से कम 100 साल मानी गई है - यह महाभारत के समय का पैमाना है, आजकल का नहीं । महाभारत युद्ध के समय भीष्म की आयु 175 साल थी । ऐसा भी सुनने में आया है कि वेदव्यास ने लगभग 300 साल की आयु प्राप्त की थी ।
.
Click to expand...

Hi Uncle ,

If max life of man can be 400 year as per your statement then what would you say about Shiv Bhagat Guru Prashurama who started his journey from Ramayana till Mahabharta and I don't know what happened to him after mahabharata ..........?????
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top