Which one is better?
- Thread starter annch
- Start date
urmiladuhan
New member
Very funny!- the comparison, I mean.
Brahm,
Reference: Only the Pic in the attachment.
Woman did not evolve, because she just needed to be master of one....MAN.....survival ke liye aur evolve hone kii zaroorat hee nahin padi!!!
Reference: Only the Pic in the attachment.
Woman did not evolve, because she just needed to be master of one....MAN.....survival ke liye aur evolve hone kii zaroorat hee nahin padi!!!
Urmila ji,
After a certain time, we cannot edit our posts. I have requested the moderators to do so.
Regards
After a certain time, we cannot edit our posts. I have requested the moderators to do so.
Regards
shailendra
New member
Brahm,
Reference: Only the Pic in the attachment.
Woman did not evolve, because she just needed to be master of one....MAN.....survival ke liye aur evolve hone kii zaroorat hee nahin padi!!!
Hmmmmmm... either that Watson, OR the woman eventually evolved into a man (Yikes!
) depending on how you look at the 'complete picture' within that funny graphical representation! 
brahmtewatia
Active member
madam,
now tht you have patted the definitions, d'u still want me to proceed?... ok, since you are so anxious, i've a humble request before i proceed - please bear with me nd dont feel offended after the explanation tht follows...
explanation:
i thot tht i'm done after my abv remarks in red nd after giving you the links. it was expected tht after getting the definitions right, you shud have proceeded to the links for further information, esp. on renaissance men, wch i've equated with 'jack of all trades' in my earlier posts. but, it seems tht you've ignored my p.s. nd didn't concentrated on the text provided in wiki links (<<< no pun intended, pls take it easy)... anyways, you just justified the evolution of woman, in my previous pic attachment... 2009 A.D or 2050 A.D not much difference.
@anju post # 103 : woman didn't evolved !!! you see the repercussions now, no-one can defy the laws of evolution.
p.s. : apologies in advance, if you still feel offended... honestly i didn't wanted to put this post.
I have the definitions pat down now!
I'm patiently waiting for you to proceed
Last edited:
akshaymalik84
Active member
Brahm,
Reference: Only the Pic in the attachment.
Woman did not evolve, because she just needed to be master of one....MAN.....survival ke liye aur evolve hone kii zaroorat hee nahin padi!!!
Rightly said!
BUt you(women) don't need to be a subordinate if you are master of Man. Survival word is contradicting the word Master.
Last edited:
shailendra
New member
... and the evolution...
...probably never stops!...
...probably never stops!...
Holmes.....you are disregarding continuity of (hu)man race?
OR the woman eventually evolved into a man
True, survival contradicts master.
But don't u think, "survival" word is apt in context of evolution?
But don't u think, "survival" word is apt in context of evolution?
Rightly said!
BUt you(women) don't need to be a subordinate if you are master of Man. Survival word is contradicting the word Master.
shailendra
New member
...well, tell ya what mebbe I was reminiscing about a certain long-lost thread that related to the rewriting of the section 377 of the Indian penal Court!
Brahm,
Aap shaanpat karo ho with "apologies in advance"...
aap agar eeb woman ke efforts ko provoke karoge to revolution aa jyaga!!!
Aap shaanpat karo ho with "apologies in advance"...
aap agar eeb woman ke efforts ko provoke karoge to revolution aa jyaga!!!
Last edited:
Nice one...as ususal...
As per the pic, MAN seems to be "de-volving"...
As per the pic, MAN seems to be "de-volving"...
...probably never stops!...
akshaymalik84
Active member
It certainly do.
But i think survival was a thinking of past. Evolution is a process, and survival may be first priority but then revolution came.
brahmtewatia
Active member
oh... you mean r(evolution) of women ???... i wish tht shud happen nd it was not shyaanpat, it was my respect/apologies for the evolving woman (at JATland).Brahm,
Aap shaanpat karo ho with "apologies in advance"...
aap agar eeb woman ke efforts ko provoke karoge to revolution aa jyaga!!!
Q = btw, wch efforts you are talking ???
p.s. : efforts have to be provoked further, for better results
............ (provocation is in reference to evolution, pls dont implicate with other meanings)
Last edited:
urmiladuhan
New member
When you ASSUME, you try to make an ASS of U and ME. I know my position in the animal kingdom (i.e., human). You just identified yours!
p.s: no pun should be "assumed".
urmiladuhan
New member
For Shailendra Hooda:
No Lois Lane in the photo?
No Lois Lane in the photo?
Last edited:
brahmtewatia
Active member
pls. read this (red nd highlighted)
v
v
v
v
^
now go back, nd read abv in red nd tell me who is assuming ? (>>> on my behalf no pun assumed)
v
v
now read this
v
v
v
v
v
please have your last word. my heartfelt apologies if you felt bad or offended... honestly tht was n'vr the intention.
v
v
when i proceeded (post # 106) you said i'm assumingI have the definitions pat down now!
I'm patiently waiting for you to proceed
v
v
^
^
now go back, nd read abv in red nd tell me who is assuming ? (>>> on my behalf no pun assumed)
v
v
now read this
v
v
ok, now this one makes sensekitne samajdar ho aap
vaise baat gudgamme ki ho rhi thi aap andhra pradesh pauch ge
v
v
v
v
please have your last word. my heartfelt apologies if you felt bad or offended... honestly tht was n'vr the intention.