i am not a very religious person but always believed in god.i m a very god fearing person .i m always afraid of being punsihed by god if i harm or deceive any body.but recently i have been noticing so many incidences where bad ppl are continuously thriving inspite of their bad deeds.innocent kids suffering.i m kind of annoyed with god.why so?i have always treated or considered god as my parent.but recently i have started losing faith in him.is this the way of kalyug ? or its destiny? where is the rule of karma which i always believed.
why innocent suffers and evil flourish
- Thread starter ritu
- Start date
sidchhikara
New member
God recently started working on Wall Street or the government - it might explain the evil behavior.
Does He really exists? or may be it's no longer easy to track 6 billion people.
Why is god necessarily a HE? A feminist would come and bury you alive for making such a scandulous statement on the historic day when women's reservation bill got passed!
There are two very uncommon sayings-
1) The more you have faith in God, the more he will test you to check how strong is your faith..
2) The moment you question the workings of God, you cast a doubt on your faith in God....that's why you got to have "blind" faith.....
So, we have to suffer and smile to attain whatever we are supposed to get for having faith in God....and we will get it when we "die"........
1) The more you have faith in God, the more he will test you to check how strong is your faith..
2) The moment you question the workings of God, you cast a doubt on your faith in God....that's why you got to have "blind" faith.....
So, we have to suffer and smile to attain whatever we are supposed to get for having faith in God....and we will get it when we "die"...
.....May be it's time to make reservation now for the post of God . Time for adequate representation of ladies.
. Time for adequate representation of ladies.me too....bcoz for me god is always like a father .
Surprisingly, in this thread, I prefer God as "He".........
sidchhikara
New member
There is the answer to - Who's your daddy?
Someone wrote on the Internet:
God is a being conceived as the perfect, omnipotent, omniscient originator and ruler of the universe, the principal object of faith and worship in monotheistic religions.
God is Lord, the alpha and omega, has always been and will be everlasting. Since God is our creator, creator of man, woman and all earthly creatures great and small, therefore void of being descriptive into being either man or woman.
God is a being conceived as the perfect, omnipotent, omniscient originator and ruler of the universe, the principal object of faith and worship in monotheistic religions.
God is Lord, the alpha and omega, has always been and will be everlasting. Since God is our creator, creator of man, woman and all earthly creatures great and small, therefore void of being descriptive into being either man or woman.
Einstein:
I see a pattern, but my imagination cannot picture the maker of that pattern. I see a clock, but I cannot envision the clockmaker. The human mind is unable to conceive of the four dimensions, so how can it conceive of a God, before whom a thousand years and a thousand dimensions are as one?
I see a pattern, but my imagination cannot picture the maker of that pattern. I see a clock, but I cannot envision the clockmaker. The human mind is unable to conceive of the four dimensions, so how can it conceive of a God, before whom a thousand years and a thousand dimensions are as one?
Last edited:
sidchhikara
New member
That is the spin people put on Einstein's quotes on religion ... Einstein never believed in a personal God. He was awed by the structure of the Universe .... and that did not mean that he believed that there was a superpower etc etc behind it. He just looked at it the way it was - check out the bold part in the quote below. Here is a quote from Einstein to debunk chatter about his religiousity:
It was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious convictions, a lie which is being systematically repeated. I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly. If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it.
-- Albert Einstein, 1954, from Albert Einstein: The Human Side, edited by Helen Dukas and Banesh Hoffman, Princeton University Press
It was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious convictions, a lie which is being systematically repeated. I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly. If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it.
-- Albert Einstein, 1954, from Albert Einstein: The Human Side, edited by Helen Dukas and Banesh Hoffman, Princeton University Press
There is no reservation in God's parliament for any.. even for so called good!
As simple as that there is no one who is a bad person.
This world is systematic.
If you arrange your work events in proper sequence , you will achieve success , whosoever you are....good or bad... in eyes of others.
As simple as that there is no one who is a bad person.
This world is systematic.
If you arrange your work events in proper sequence , you will achieve success , whosoever you are....good or bad... in eyes of others.
sidchhikara
New member
While we are on Einstein, here are couple more quotes:
The mystical trend of our time, which shows itself particularly in the rampant growth of the so-called Theosophy and Spiritualism, is for me no more than a symptom of weakness and confusion. Since our inner experiences consist of reproductions, and combinations of sensory impressions, the concept of a soul without a body seem to me to be empty and devoid of meaning.
The religion of the future will be a cosmic religion. The religion which based on experience, which refuses dogmatic. If there's any religion that would cope the scientific needs it will be Buddhism....
If people are good only because they fear punishment, and hope for reward, then we are a sorry lot indeed.
The further the spiritual evolution of mankind advances, the more certain it seems to me that the path to genuine religiosity does not lie through the fear of life, and the fear of death, and blind faith, but through striving after rational knowledge.
Immortality? There are two kinds. The first lives in the imagination of the people, and is thus an illusion. There is a relative immortality which may conserve the memory of an individual for some generations. But there is only one true immortality, on a cosmic scale, and that is the immortality of the cosmos itself. There is no other.
-- Albert Einstein, quoted in Madalyn Murray O'Hair, All the Questions You Ever Wanted to Ask American Atheists (1982) vol. ii., p. 29
Scientific research is based on the idea that everything that takes place is determined by laws of nature, and therefore this holds for the action of people. For this reason, a research scientist will hardly be inclined to believe that events could be influenced by a prayer, i.e. by a wish addressed to a Supernatural Being.
-- Albert Einstein, 1936, responding to a child who wrote and asked if scientists pray. Source: Albert Einstein: The Human Side, Edited by Helen Dukas and Banesh Hoffmann
The mystical trend of our time, which shows itself particularly in the rampant growth of the so-called Theosophy and Spiritualism, is for me no more than a symptom of weakness and confusion. Since our inner experiences consist of reproductions, and combinations of sensory impressions, the concept of a soul without a body seem to me to be empty and devoid of meaning.
The religion of the future will be a cosmic religion. The religion which based on experience, which refuses dogmatic. If there's any religion that would cope the scientific needs it will be Buddhism....
If people are good only because they fear punishment, and hope for reward, then we are a sorry lot indeed.
The further the spiritual evolution of mankind advances, the more certain it seems to me that the path to genuine religiosity does not lie through the fear of life, and the fear of death, and blind faith, but through striving after rational knowledge.
Immortality? There are two kinds. The first lives in the imagination of the people, and is thus an illusion. There is a relative immortality which may conserve the memory of an individual for some generations. But there is only one true immortality, on a cosmic scale, and that is the immortality of the cosmos itself. There is no other.
-- Albert Einstein, quoted in Madalyn Murray O'Hair, All the Questions You Ever Wanted to Ask American Atheists (1982) vol. ii., p. 29
Scientific research is based on the idea that everything that takes place is determined by laws of nature, and therefore this holds for the action of people. For this reason, a research scientist will hardly be inclined to believe that events could be influenced by a prayer, i.e. by a wish addressed to a Supernatural Being.
-- Albert Einstein, 1936, responding to a child who wrote and asked if scientists pray. Source: Albert Einstein: The Human Side, Edited by Helen Dukas and Banesh Hoffmann
sidchhikara
New member
What are you talking about ... God ... Parliament ... reservation..... weird.
I too searched on Einstein to see what he thought of God and that is the closest I could find out. Rest is on readers to interpret it the way they perceive .
.May be i sound funny, but thinking out loud..If somebody claims that God created this Earth, then i might ask who has created God..Answer could be Super God..Then i might ask who has created Super God, answer could be Super Super God..And it goes on and on..
To justify this i might say that any invention or any law is based upon some assumption..lets assume x= 10; y =20. May be we need to assume that God exists for other existence around us. You may call it God or some super power. Does it make some sense here.
Last edited:
Pt 1. No one is BAD.
Pt 2. In world each thing is systematic ....i.e. things occur in sequence one after other.
In earlier writing of mine which was a bit confusing is due to the fact that Headline in bold is not separated from rest of text.
Last edited: