wow...sub groups...gud... v r JATs

[shashiverma]

Recently I was looking at the newly added group section in JL. And i was disappointed to see groups based on the places you belong to or on gotras. So instead of just being Jat we will have further classifications based on the places/gotra..like rohtak jats, merrut jats.....nd..further. I will not be surprised if there is going to be seperate disscussions among these group insted of a common plateform and then some new yahoo or google group page after all we belong to same place..so we should share a stong bond....why to get lost in name of big community called jat....
I used to think that people make small groups so that they all can come together to make a bigger group at later stage....But this seem to be a reverse trend.....we will divide this bigger group into further small groups......why not after all we are jats....so no harm

Classifications based on the work is sometimes justified as all may not be interested and it may help people to grow. Although i would still say its better to share it on a broader plateform as it help others to increase their knowledge...

Anyways, this was just my personal opinion and concern.....so thought of bringing forward....

 

[shweta123]

Recently I was looking at the newly added group section in JL. And i was disappointed to see groups based on the places you belong to or on gotras. So instead of just being Jat we will have further classifications based on the places/gotra..like rohtak jats, merrut jats.....nd..further. I will not be surprised if there is going to be seperate disscussions among these group insted of a common plateform and then some new yahoo or google group page after all we belong to same place..so we should share a stong bond....why to get lost in name of big community called jat....
I used to think that people make small groups so that they all can come together to make a bigger group at later stage....But this seem to be a reverse trend.....we will divide this bigger group into further small groups......why not after all we are jats....so no harm

Classifications based on the work is sometimes justified as all may not be interested and it may help people to grow. Although i would still say its better to share it on a broader plateform as it help others to increase their knowledge...

Anyways, this was just my personal opinion and concern.....so thought of bringing forward....

Yeah Di I agree ! If it happens then also it leads us nowhere.

 

[mkm_jat]

Ram Ram Shashiji n All

I agree with your points that there is no point in creating such groups, on the other hand having groups like Jats@Abroad or US or any other city within india can help the Jat Bros by bringing them close who all leaving far away their home.

But I think if we start discussion within the groups that will be really bad.

My views are personal, sorry if you feel them biased or wrong.

Regards
Manoj

 

[ravinderdahiya]

Recently I was looking at the newly added group section in JL. And i was disappointed to see groups based on the places you belong to or on gotras. So instead of just being Jat we will have further classifications based on the places/gotra..like rohtak jats, merrut jats.....nd..further. I will not be surprised if there is going to be seperate disscussions among these group insted of a common plateform and then some new yahoo or google group page after all we belong to same place..so we should share a stong bond....why to get lost in name of big community called jat....
I used to think that people make small groups so that they all can come together to make a bigger group at later stage....But this seem to be a reverse trend.....we will divide this bigger group into further small groups......why not after all we are jats....so no harm

Classifications based on the work is sometimes justified as all may not be interested and it may help people to grow. Although i would still say its better to share it on a broader plateform as it help others to increase their knowledge...

Anyways, this was just my personal opinion and concern.....so thought of bringing forward....

Ek dum sahi Sashi ji, I am sure that we do not need any further divide among Jats.
Rather we should try for unification as I feel we already have got enough divide as haryanvi Jat, UP ka Jat etc. etc.(which should not be there)

arr bhai kaha bhi gaya hai " Anpad Jat Padha barabar, aur padhya Jat khuda barabar"

arr Khuda(bhagwan) toh har jagah ek hi jaisa hota hai.

 

[ygulia]

I agree with Shashi.

 

[ritu]

very rt shashi .and frankly telling you it seems its more over here not in real life.quote=shashiverma;169232]Recently I was looking at the newly added group section in JL. And i was disappointed to see groups based on the places you belong to or on gotras. So instead of just being Jat we will have further classifications based on the places/gotra..like rohtak jats, merrut jats.....nd..further. I will not be surprised if there is going to be seperate disscussions among these group insted of a common plateform and then some new yahoo or google group page after all we belong to same place..so we should share a stong bond....why to get lost in name of big community called jat....
I used to think that people make small groups so that they all can come together to make a bigger group at later stage....But this seem to be a reverse trend.....we will divide this bigger group into further small groups......why not after all we are jats....so no harm

Classifications based on the work is sometimes justified as all may not be interested and it may help people to grow. Although i would still say its better to share it on a broader plateform as it help others to increase their knowledge...

Anyways, this was just my personal opinion and concern.....so thought of bringing forward....[/quote]

 

[vijay]

Personally i don't think that it's that bad ...... as it shows that what someone is upto and what's their mental level ........... hehehe ........... i like to analyze people.

I don't like the 'psudo forum face' of the people but really appreciate the genuine personalities who are here for some reasons only but not for their existance.

I wanted to bring out this fact ( once i mentioned it in chaupal too .... ) but restricted myself to do that as i know how people react on these issues ........

Shashi, Nice point raised as u did previously ( I hope you know which one ....... )