A
ajayrohtak
Guest
here is the chart showing haryana`s growth
No: 29 Haryana
- Thread starter ssgoyat
- Start date
- Status
Italian ki chhod pahlyaa aapne Hindustaniyaan ki baat kar,,,,,,,,bataa ke kar diye bhai tere Hindustaaniyaan ne,,,,,,,,,Mayawat te theek hogi naa......Lalu Prasad Yadav to theek hoga naa,,,Mulayam theek hoga na,,,,,,,Raj Thaakre te theek hogaa ne,,,,,,,Capt Amrinder te theek hoga ne,,,,,,,,Bhajan Lal bhi theek hogaa,,,,,,,Chautala bhi theek hogaa,,,,,,,Jai Lalita bhi theek hogi,,,,,,Uma Bharti bhi theek hogi,,,,,,,Vasundhra Raje bhi theek hogi,,,,,,,Shivraj Patil bhi theek hoga,,,,,,,,,Arjan Singh bhi theek hoga,,,,,,,,,Natwar Singh bhi theek hoga,,,,,,,,,Amar Singh bhi theek hoga,,,,,,Papu Yadav ar Shahabudin bhi theek honge,,,,,,Adwani to theek hoga naa,,,,,,,,,je ye itne badhiyaa ar desh bhakt aadmi se te kyun na karte ye kaam ar kyun naa maanti public inhe leader
ham baahar aalya pe to ek dum jor dedyaa saaa,,,,,pahlyaa aapne aalyaa ki baat kar,,,,,,,ar Bhai yaa Desh mein byaahi aa rhi se,,,,,,,aur bol,,,,,,,,
ham baahar aalya pe to ek dum jor dedyaa saaa,,,,,pahlyaa aapne aalyaa ki baat kar,,,,,,,ar Bhai yaa Desh mein byaahi aa rhi se,,,,,,,aur bol,,,,,,,,
A
ajayrohtak
Guest
bhai shab i would like to share this little piece of information with you
Last edited by a moderator:
A
ajayrohtak
Guest
HARYANA NO.3 IN STATE WISE PER CAPITA INCOME AFTER DELHI AND GOA
http://www.livemint.com/2008/01/2117...-register.html
New Delhi: Jharkhand and Orissa are growing at a frenetic pace in terms of their per capita income, owing to a massive thrust that industrial activity has received in the two mineral rich states while Karnataka, Gujarat and Tamil Nadu have maintained leads among other states.
According to an Assocham Eco Pulse (AEP) study on ‘States performance in per capita income’ has highlighted that Jharkhand, with per capita income of Rs14,990, has registered 16.6% growth. With an abundant resource of mineral and other natural resources, the state has been receiving investment proposals in steel, cement and power sectors, giving necessary push to its economy, providing sufficient employment opportunities.
With influx of huge capex by the large industrial houses in the core infrastructure sector, Orissa is witnessing a rapid rise of 11.5% in income distribution (Rs14,795).
Per capita income reflects on the purchasing power and standard of living of the people of each state. For inclusive growth, it is necessary for the states to put in efforts to raise the income attributable to each person.
Buoyed by huge investment flow, rising employment opportunities, increasing foothold of service-based sectors, southern states of Karnataka and Tamil Nadu and industrialized Gujarat rank among the top states with per capita income more than the all-India average of Rs20,734 (in FY06).
Karnataka tops the chart of well-to-do states with fastest growing income per person by 9.28% at Rs21829 for the FY 2006. Gujarat’s average income per person rose to Rs26,543 with growth of 8.92%. Per capita income in Tamil Nadu was recorded at Rs24,308 with rise of 8.46%. Noticeably, these best performing states are among the 10 most populous Indian states with more than 54 million population each.
However, Delhi and Goa, relatively smaller states, have highest per capita income at Rs49172 and Rs47507 but the rate of growth is relatively lower at 6.9% and 6%.
The state of Chhattisgarh struggling at political, social and economic front, witnessed 8.8% growth, though average income base remains very low at Rs16,365.
Development plans in Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh and Bihar are yet to take off as they remain at the bottom of the pyramid with lowest per capita incomes of Rs12566, Rs10637 and Rs6610 growing at the slowest rates of 2.9%, 3.1% and 3.7% respectively.
Per capita income in 17 states was growing below the national average of 8.4% while per capita income for the Indian economy grew to Rs22,483 in FY07 from Rs20,734 in FY06.
Maharashtra, with the largest state domestic product and major recipient of foreign as well as domestic investment, has witnessed a healthy growth rate of 7.3% in its per capita income (29,085). Another state to record above 7% growth was Uttaranchal, though the income base was low at Rs20, 328 per person in fiscal 06.
Haryana, with prosperous farm sector and booming IT, real estates, engineering and construction activities, has the third largest per capita income of Rs 29,887 growing at 6.5%.
West Bengal, despite having the fourth largest population, has managed to raise its per capita income at a rate of 6%, owing to massive investment plans in sectors like steel, real estate, power, retail and IT. The average income per person was recorded at Rs 20,485 in the fiscal 2005-2006.
There were states where the effect of overall economic boom was not reflected in their per capita income. While the state domestic product of Kerela and Andhra Pradesh grew by 8.8% and 7% respectively, average income available to each person grew by 5.9% each.
Per capita income in scarcely populated Himachal Pradesh rose at a moderate growth rate of 5.34%. As the state remains predominantly dependent on tourism sector, the level of industrial investment remains low. Per capita income was recorded at Rs27,162 in fiscal 06.
Growth in the prosperous state of Punjab seems to have stalled as rise in per capita was estimated to be mere 2.9%, even though it has the fifth largest per capita income of Rs28,605.
http://www.livemint.com/2008/01/2117...-register.html
New Delhi: Jharkhand and Orissa are growing at a frenetic pace in terms of their per capita income, owing to a massive thrust that industrial activity has received in the two mineral rich states while Karnataka, Gujarat and Tamil Nadu have maintained leads among other states.
According to an Assocham Eco Pulse (AEP) study on ‘States performance in per capita income’ has highlighted that Jharkhand, with per capita income of Rs14,990, has registered 16.6% growth. With an abundant resource of mineral and other natural resources, the state has been receiving investment proposals in steel, cement and power sectors, giving necessary push to its economy, providing sufficient employment opportunities.
With influx of huge capex by the large industrial houses in the core infrastructure sector, Orissa is witnessing a rapid rise of 11.5% in income distribution (Rs14,795).
Per capita income reflects on the purchasing power and standard of living of the people of each state. For inclusive growth, it is necessary for the states to put in efforts to raise the income attributable to each person.
Buoyed by huge investment flow, rising employment opportunities, increasing foothold of service-based sectors, southern states of Karnataka and Tamil Nadu and industrialized Gujarat rank among the top states with per capita income more than the all-India average of Rs20,734 (in FY06).
Karnataka tops the chart of well-to-do states with fastest growing income per person by 9.28% at Rs21829 for the FY 2006. Gujarat’s average income per person rose to Rs26,543 with growth of 8.92%. Per capita income in Tamil Nadu was recorded at Rs24,308 with rise of 8.46%. Noticeably, these best performing states are among the 10 most populous Indian states with more than 54 million population each.
However, Delhi and Goa, relatively smaller states, have highest per capita income at Rs49172 and Rs47507 but the rate of growth is relatively lower at 6.9% and 6%.
The state of Chhattisgarh struggling at political, social and economic front, witnessed 8.8% growth, though average income base remains very low at Rs16,365.
Development plans in Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh and Bihar are yet to take off as they remain at the bottom of the pyramid with lowest per capita incomes of Rs12566, Rs10637 and Rs6610 growing at the slowest rates of 2.9%, 3.1% and 3.7% respectively.
Per capita income in 17 states was growing below the national average of 8.4% while per capita income for the Indian economy grew to Rs22,483 in FY07 from Rs20,734 in FY06.
Maharashtra, with the largest state domestic product and major recipient of foreign as well as domestic investment, has witnessed a healthy growth rate of 7.3% in its per capita income (29,085). Another state to record above 7% growth was Uttaranchal, though the income base was low at Rs20, 328 per person in fiscal 06.
Haryana, with prosperous farm sector and booming IT, real estates, engineering and construction activities, has the third largest per capita income of Rs 29,887 growing at 6.5%.
West Bengal, despite having the fourth largest population, has managed to raise its per capita income at a rate of 6%, owing to massive investment plans in sectors like steel, real estate, power, retail and IT. The average income per person was recorded at Rs 20,485 in the fiscal 2005-2006.
There were states where the effect of overall economic boom was not reflected in their per capita income. While the state domestic product of Kerela and Andhra Pradesh grew by 8.8% and 7% respectively, average income available to each person grew by 5.9% each.
Per capita income in scarcely populated Himachal Pradesh rose at a moderate growth rate of 5.34%. As the state remains predominantly dependent on tourism sector, the level of industrial investment remains low. Per capita income was recorded at Rs27,162 in fiscal 06.
Growth in the prosperous state of Punjab seems to have stalled as rise in per capita was estimated to be mere 2.9%, even though it has the fifth largest per capita income of Rs28,605.
A
ajayrohtak
Guest
http://www.indianexpress.com/story/218431.html
HARYANA :THE GROWTH ENGINE OF PRESENT INDIA
The regional distribution of investment in states offer some surprises and reinforces some stereotypes. Haryana and Orissa are witnessing big gains in investment, while Rajasthan, U.P and Bihar remain BIMARU.
HARYANA :THE GROWTH ENGINE OF PRESENT INDIA
The regional distribution of investment in states offer some surprises and reinforces some stereotypes. Haryana and Orissa are witnessing big gains in investment, while Rajasthan, U.P and Bihar remain BIMARU.
We examine data on projects under implementation in various states in the CMIE Capex data base. We compare data for June 2007 with June 2005 to assess how a state has fared on investment compared to its previous performance. For proper comparison we rank states acccording to projects under implementation on a per capita basis. See table below.
The most striking change is in Haryana which has seen the biggest change in investment. Ten years ago, it was at rank 14 and five years ago it was at rank 13. Now, it stands at rank 1, with investment under implementation of Rs.78,500 per capita.
Orissa is also a major gainer, particularly over the last five years. It went from rank 8 to rank 2 over the last five years. While the Indian average for projects under implementation on a per capita basis grew by 93%, Orissa gained by 381% over the last five years to reach Rs.61,811 of investment per capita.
Himachal Pradesh has seen sluggish growth of just 14% compared with five years ago. It has slipped from rank 1 to rank 3, and now has investment of Rs.58,974 per capita.
Gujarat witnessed growth of 85%, which was slightly worse than the national average growth of 93%, in the last five years. It now stands at rank 4, with investment per capita of Rs.41,585.
Uttarakhand grew a little worse than Gujarat, gaining 73% to go from rank 3 to rank 5. It now has per capita investment under implementation of Rs.34,858.
Jharkhand has got dramatic growth of 331% in the last five years, and has thus gone from rank 14 to rank 6. It now has per capita investment of Rs.33,828.
Karnataka gets written about as doing well in IT, but the situation on investment is not good. While the Indian average gained 93% over the last five years, Karnataka gained only 59%. It hence went from rank 5 to rank 7. It now has per capita investment under implementation of Rs.30,560.
Andhra Pradesh has had growth of 80%, which is similar to the national average of 93%. With this, it stands at rank 8, with investment of Rs.22,317 per capita.
Tamil Nadu has done shockingly badly in the last five years. In 2002, Tamil Nadu was at rank 4, with investment of Rs.19,981 per capita - this was almost double of the national average. In the last five years, it witnessed growth of only 1% while the national average moved forward by 93%. Today, Tamil Nadu is at investment under implementation of Rs.20,243 per capita, which is just a bit ahead of the national average. It has dropped to rank 9 compared with rank 4.
Maharashtra has also underperformed in the last five years. It got growth of just 50% while the national average grew by 93%. It went from rank 7 to rank 10. It is now just slightly above the national average with investment under implementation of Rs.19,303 per capita.
Jammu and Kashmir has got poor growth of just 22% over the last five years, much below the national average of 93%. With this, it ends up at rank 11 with investment per capita essentially at the national average of Rs.19,091.
The remaining states have investment per capita of below the national average of Rs.18,901 per capita.
Chattisgarh has grown in line with the national average growth and stands at Rs.18,582 of per capita investment under implementation.
Kerala got poor growth of 73% while the national average grew by 93%. It has dropped from rank 10 to rank 13 in the last five years, and now has investment per capita of Rs.18,110.
Punjab has done badly, dropping from rank 11 to rank 14 with growth of just 52%. It now stands at Rs.15,861 per capita, clearly behind the national average of Rs.18,901.
West Bengal has gained dramatically over the last five years, growing by 202% while the national average rose by 93%. Through this, it went up from rank 17 to rank 15. However, in absolute terms, the situation is poor, with investment of Rs.14,467 per capita, which is behind the national average.
The bottom five slots in the ranking are occupied by Assam and the BIMARU states. Of these, Madhya Pradesh and Assam have got credible growth rates of 80% and 87%, both of which are within striking range of the overall average growth of 93%. Uttar Pradesh has done poorly in the last five years, but it managed growth of 64%, which is not that far from 93%.
It is interesting to note that the states of Chattisgarh, Jharkhand and Uttarakhand, all of which are breakaways from BIMARU states, appear to be faring better than the BIMARU states themselves. While BIMARU states are a problem, the number of people who are living in BIMARU states is much lower than it was before these three new states were created.
The worst situation is found in Rajasthan and Bihar. Rajasthan got growth of 10% and Bihar got growth of -3%. Rajasthan now has investment of Rs.5304 per capita and Bihar is at Rs.2911 per capita - both of which are vastly below the national average of Rs.18,901 per capita.
bhaisaab
Aapke diye gaye link ke hisab se per capita figures hain..
1. Delhi : Rs49172
2. Goa: Rs47507
3. Haryana: Rs 29,887
No: 1 to is hisab se bhi nahi hua na.....
bhai yo bhi dekkya manne to....ghana purana data sai..
table me nyuu likkh rakkhi sai...stats in June 2007 (and that too UNDER IMPLEMENTATION)
A
ajayrohtak
Guest
Well as delhi and goa are city states with no rural population..you can say that haryana is no.1 if you look at major statesbhaisaab
Aapke diye gaye link ke hisab se per capita figures hain..
1. Delhi : Rs49172
2. Goa: Rs47507
3. Haryana: Rs 29,887
No: 1 to is hisab se bhi nahi hua na.....
A
ajayrohtak
Guest
2007 is not that late.....and we are eagerly waited for the new data as that will further cemented the place of haryana in the top...haryana is moving ahead with a pace other states even cant dream offbhai yo bhi dekkya manne to....ghana purana data sai..
table me nyuu likkh rakkhi sai...stats in June 2007 (and that too UNDER IMPLEMENTATION)
A
ajayrohtak
Guest
if we believe you thn haryana within three years slides all the way from no.1 to no.35....bhai yo data bhi 2005-06 ka sai....
Last edited by a moderator:
A
ajayrohtak
Guest
here is the fresh data Freshi Bhai sahabbhai yo data bhi 2005-06 ka sai....
India Per capita income rises in Haryana
Chandigarh | Wednesday, Jan 28 2009 IST
The per capita income of the people of Haryana has increased to Rs 38,720 in 2007-08 from Rs 35,779 in 2006-07 at the constant price and Rs 56,280 from Rs 49,038 at current prices.
Stating this here today, Haryana Minister Birender Singh said this had been possible due to better of the state. He said Haryana, which ranked at second place in per capita income after Goa, had been reckoned as one of the best in the country by the Planning Commission and 12th Finance Commission.
The Minister said against the expenditure of Rs 2,108 crore of annual plan in 2004-05, the plan expenditure during 2005-06 was Rs 2,997 crore which shows an increase of Rs 889 crore and it was 42 per cent higher than the previous year.
He said similarly, the annual plan of 2008-09 was approved at Rs 6650 crore which had been revised to Rs 7,130 crore which was higher by 338.24 per cent than the expenditure of annual plan of 2004-05.
While referring to the achievement of the Excise and Taxation Department, he said the tax receipt under the (VAT) and Central sales tax CST was expected to be Rs 9,100 crore during the current financial year and it was expected that excise duty would touch a figure of Rs 1,500 crore.http://news.webindia123.com/news/Articles/India/20090128/1163355.html
A
ajayrohtak
Guest
Harayana economy fresh data
Chandigarh: The per capita income of the people of the State has increased to Rs. 38,720 in 2007-08 from Rs. 35779 in 2006-07 at the constant price and Rs. 56,280 from Rs. 49,038 at current prices.
Minister Birender Singh said here today that this had been possible due to better of the State.
He said that Haryana had been reckoned as one of the best in the country by planning commission and 12th Finance Commission, which resulted in that State had ranks at second place in per capita income after Goa State.
The Minister said that against the expenditure of Rs. 2108 crore of annual plan in 2004-05, the plan expenditure during 2005-06 was Rs. 2997 crore which shows an increase of Rs. 889 crore and it was 42 per cent higher than the previous year.
He said that similarly the annual plan of 2008-09 was approved of Rs. 6650 crore which had been revised to Rs. 7130 crore which was higher by 338.24 per cent then the expenditure of annual plan 2004-05.
http://finance.indiainfo.com/2009/01/28/0901281844_per_capita_income_rises_in_haryana.html
Chandigarh: The per capita income of the people of the State has increased to Rs. 38,720 in 2007-08 from Rs. 35779 in 2006-07 at the constant price and Rs. 56,280 from Rs. 49,038 at current prices.
Minister Birender Singh said here today that this had been possible due to better of the State.
He said that Haryana had been reckoned as one of the best in the country by planning commission and 12th Finance Commission, which resulted in that State had ranks at second place in per capita income after Goa State.
The Minister said that against the expenditure of Rs. 2108 crore of annual plan in 2004-05, the plan expenditure during 2005-06 was Rs. 2997 crore which shows an increase of Rs. 889 crore and it was 42 per cent higher than the previous year.
He said that similarly the annual plan of 2008-09 was approved of Rs. 6650 crore which had been revised to Rs. 7130 crore which was higher by 338.24 per cent then the expenditure of annual plan 2004-05.
http://finance.indiainfo.com/2009/01/28/0901281844_per_capita_income_rises_in_haryana.html
Last edited by a moderator:
hmmm
fer bhi No: 1 to eeb bhi na sai........Goa pehlam se..
arr unn bhi ya baat minister keh se...koi source nahi???
nyu to chief minister ne bhi chunav prachaar..No:1 haryana ki raagni guvaa rakkhi sai.....
A
ajayrohtak
Guest
DONT be so innocent bhai....he said this in the Assembly where he was telling the members about the condition of the economy...He didnt say it in a political rally.....hmmm
fer bhi No: 1 to eeb bhi na sai........Goa pehlam se..
arr unn bhi ya baat minister keh se...koi source nahi???
nyu to chief minister ne bhi chunav prachaar..No:1 haryana ki raagni guvaa rakkhi sai.....
A
ajayrohtak
Guest
CHANDIGARH: Haryana Governor A. R. Kidwai on Friday expressed concern over the unprecedented economic meltdown, adding that the State Government was determined to meet this new challenge with greater vigour and renewed optimism.
Addressing the members of the Haryana Assembly on the opening day of the Budget session here, Dr. Kidwai said: “We have to ensure that none of our programmes suffers a setback and at the same time [they] achieve a healthy rate of growth.”
He stated that the State Government was trying to speed up public spending to boost the economy. The size of the Annual Plan for 2009-10 was being increased by 50.37 per cent from Rs.6,650 crore to Rs.10,000 crore. Most of the increase was due to higher allocation for infrastructure comprising power, roads, buildings, water supply and sanitation.
Due to overall economic buoyancy, the State had been steadily increasing the size of the annual plans during the past four years, said the Governor, adding that the Government had not only achieved the plan targets, but also surpassed them. The Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) during 2007-08 was estimated at Rs.153,087 crore as against Rs.130,033 crore in 2006-07, registering a growth rate of 17.7 per cent at current prices.
The per capita income at current prices was estimated at Rs.58,531 in 2007-08 as against Rs.50,488 in 2006-07. “Haryana has the highest per capita income, next only to Goa, among the States,” he added.
Dr. Kidwai appreciated that in the past one year the State Government had consolidated its development efforts on all fronts and Haryana had witnessed stable, non-discriminatory and progressive governance during the past four years. It was the resolve of the Government to continue with the positive developments and strengthen them further, he added.
He said the State Government had always looked after the employees’ interests and revised their pay scales on the recommendations of the Sixth Central Pay Commission. House Rent Allowance, Medical Allowance and various other allowances had been enhanced and the Leave Travel Concession scheme liberalised.
He disclosed that three more medical colleges, including one exclusively for girls, and four research laboratories were proposed to be set up in Haryana.
Dr. Kidwai reiterated the firm commitment of the Government to get Haryana’s complete share in the Ravi-Beas waters through the Sutlej-Yamuna-Link Canal. “Concerted efforts are being made to have the matter expedited,” he added. High priority was being given to optimal use and equitable distribution of canal water across the State.
The Bhakra Main Line–Hansi Branch–Butana Branch multipurpose link channel had been completed during 2008-09. To connect it with the Bhakra Main Line, efforts were being made to resolve the legal issues. For providing irrigation and drinking water facilities to the backward areas of Mewat, a canal is proposed to be taken up during 2009-10. Haryana is also pursuing the construction of up-stream storages namely Kishau, Renuka and Lakhwar Vyasi dams on the Yamuna.
The Governor in his opening remarks paid homage to eminent freedom fighter and parliamentarian Chaudhary Ranbir Singh who passed away on February 1.
http://www.hindu.com/2009/02/07/stories/2009020754480500.htm
Addressing the members of the Haryana Assembly on the opening day of the Budget session here, Dr. Kidwai said: “We have to ensure that none of our programmes suffers a setback and at the same time [they] achieve a healthy rate of growth.”
He stated that the State Government was trying to speed up public spending to boost the economy. The size of the Annual Plan for 2009-10 was being increased by 50.37 per cent from Rs.6,650 crore to Rs.10,000 crore. Most of the increase was due to higher allocation for infrastructure comprising power, roads, buildings, water supply and sanitation.
Due to overall economic buoyancy, the State had been steadily increasing the size of the annual plans during the past four years, said the Governor, adding that the Government had not only achieved the plan targets, but also surpassed them. The Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) during 2007-08 was estimated at Rs.153,087 crore as against Rs.130,033 crore in 2006-07, registering a growth rate of 17.7 per cent at current prices.
The per capita income at current prices was estimated at Rs.58,531 in 2007-08 as against Rs.50,488 in 2006-07. “Haryana has the highest per capita income, next only to Goa, among the States,” he added.
Dr. Kidwai appreciated that in the past one year the State Government had consolidated its development efforts on all fronts and Haryana had witnessed stable, non-discriminatory and progressive governance during the past four years. It was the resolve of the Government to continue with the positive developments and strengthen them further, he added.
He said the State Government had always looked after the employees’ interests and revised their pay scales on the recommendations of the Sixth Central Pay Commission. House Rent Allowance, Medical Allowance and various other allowances had been enhanced and the Leave Travel Concession scheme liberalised.
He disclosed that three more medical colleges, including one exclusively for girls, and four research laboratories were proposed to be set up in Haryana.
Dr. Kidwai reiterated the firm commitment of the Government to get Haryana’s complete share in the Ravi-Beas waters through the Sutlej-Yamuna-Link Canal. “Concerted efforts are being made to have the matter expedited,” he added. High priority was being given to optimal use and equitable distribution of canal water across the State.
The Bhakra Main Line–Hansi Branch–Butana Branch multipurpose link channel had been completed during 2008-09. To connect it with the Bhakra Main Line, efforts were being made to resolve the legal issues. For providing irrigation and drinking water facilities to the backward areas of Mewat, a canal is proposed to be taken up during 2009-10. Haryana is also pursuing the construction of up-stream storages namely Kishau, Renuka and Lakhwar Vyasi dams on the Yamuna.
The Governor in his opening remarks paid homage to eminent freedom fighter and parliamentarian Chaudhary Ranbir Singh who passed away on February 1.
http://www.hindu.com/2009/02/07/stories/2009020754480500.htm
A
ajayrohtak
Guest
he quoted the sources from the planning commission...i have presented you with so many data to prove my point wheras you are just living in a denial mode.....its same like india-pakistan....where pakistan never accepts that the mumbai attacks where planned in pakistan eventhough india have presented them with so much of datahmmm
fer bhi No: 1 to eeb bhi na sai........Goa pehlam se..
arr unn bhi ya baat minister keh se...koi source nahi???
nyu to chief minister ne bhi chunav prachaar..No:1 haryana ki raagni guvaa rakkhi sai.....
He might not have said in any political rally...but said in presence of media (that's how, u n me came to know of it) na
Koi source bata bhaaaai....koi statistics...survey....research....
nyu minister to kehan ke e hoya karein.....
kyunn google ne dukhi kare se bhai is per capita income ke chakkar me
JE HARYANA ISA E PROSPEROUS HONDA...No-1....HIGHEST PER CAPITA INCOME....falaan dikhad...
FER KYUNN RESERVATION KI DEMAND KI JAVE SE......
contradiction ho gayi donnu baat....
bhai kyunn dukhi ho rahya sai, nyu ke dhakke te haan bolli jaya kare kadde....
A
ajayrohtak
Guest
My dear brother do you know that whatever happened in the assembly or parliament is recorded as a data.....and thats a official government data ....if anyone want to see that he can see it..wher is the media come from???media just quoted him whatever he said in the assemblyHe might not have said in any political rally...but said in presence of media (that's how, u n me came to know of it) na
Koi source bata bhaaaai....koi statistics...survey....research....
nyu minister to kehan ke e hoya karein.....
kyunn google ne dukhi kare se bhai is per capita income ke chakkar me
JE HARYANA ISA E PROSPEROUS HONDA...No-1....HIGHEST PER CAPITA INCOME....falaan dikhad...
FER KYUNN RESERVATION KI DEMAND KI JAVE SE......
contradiction ho gayi donnu baat....
bhai kyunn dukhi ho rahya sai, nyu ke dhakke te haan bolli jaya kare kadde....
you said that you believe in researchs ..but when i presented you with neutral data you denied it by saying it OLD..even though that data was from 2007....in economic terms 2007 is not an old data,,its fairly new...if you want to see the 2009 data thn wait for 2010..coz only thn government can tell you what happened in the past year
- Status