Movie's Reviews

Revolver

3.5/5.00 (relative to Guy Ritchie's other movies)

Humor, Jason Statham...and anti-climax...the ultimate con
Took a little (lot?) while to grasp the story :D.......

the punch lines:

1) You only get better by playing a better opponent
2) We are all approval junkies
 
avtar is a must watch its a kind of movie u can watch once but not again. definitely deserves 4/5. wont be so much fun without 3d
 
Waited 10 yrs. for the Technology to catch up!!!...

anjoo said:
When I saw the rushes, I thought the same......and then read about $300 million spent in making this movie.....
You will find humor, action and a message.....and a dream may be....:)..
Click to expand...

gaganjat said:
avtar is a must watch its a kind of movie u can watch once but not again. definitely deserves 4/5. wont be so much fun without 3d
Click to expand...

Hmmm....will have to go watch this one for sure!...(Once the mania dies down a bit and one can actually step into a theatre without crazy/hysterical folks scrambling over each other to get in.....;))

...and by the way apart from (or more astonishing) than the $380 mill. plus price tag on the movie, there's another piece of most interesting tit-bit:

James Cameron turned down a chance to make “Avatar” for Twentieth Century Fox more than a decade ago to wait until technology caught up with his imagination. [Wohooo...I like that! :rock]

“Avatar” was shot using a dual-camera 3-D system that Cameron, 55, invented with partner Vince Pace after the director’s 1997 success with “Titanic,” the all-time top-grossing film.
Apparently Executives at Fox, (the studio that had also backed “Titanic,”) were willing to start work on “Avatar” almost right away after the huge success of the oscar winning movie...

Cameron didn’t think the technology was ready. He teamed with Pace, who specializes in making film equipment for tough locations, and spent 10 years developing a camera system that mimics the human eye to add realism to 3-D imagery. “Avatar” btw also is Cameron’s first feature film since the hugely successful “Titanic.”

Now that's what I call having a drive for something....for your dreams....... whew!!! :):):)
 
True true true !

I took my glasses off few times to see how i feel if its not 3-D....nd ye no point watching it without 3d.

I came home about 2 am after watching 10.45 show at Cannaught palace last night and I am still thinking wat my avatar is gonna look like (nd all the other things) and the things i will do if i go to tat world.

i wont talk much about it otherwise u guys wont enjoy the movie.



shailendra said:
Hmmm....will have to go watch this one for sure!...(Once the mania dies down a bit and one can actually step into a theatre without crazy/hysterical folks scrambling over each other to get in.....;))

...and by the way apart from (or more astonishing) than the $380 mill. plus price tag on the movie, there's another piece of most interesting tit-bit:

James Cameron turned down a chance to make “Avatar” for Twentieth Century Fox more than a decade ago to wait until technology caught up with his imagination. [Wohooo...I like that! :rock]

“Avatar” was shot using a dual-camera 3-D system that Cameron, 55, invented with partner Vince Pace after the director’s 1997 success with “Titanic,” the all-time top-grossing film.
Apparently Executives at Fox, (the studio that had also backed “Titanic,”) were willing to start work on “Avatar” almost right away after the huge success of the oscar winning movie...

Cameron didn’t think the technology was ready. He teamed with Pace, who specializes in making film equipment for tough locations, and spent 10 years developing a camera system that mimics the human eye to add realism to 3-D imagery. “Avatar” btw also is Cameron’s first feature film since the hugely successful “Titanic.”

Now that's what I call having a drive for something....for your dreams....... whew!!! :):):)
Click to expand...
 
Some dreams are worth the wait and how!!!

Thanks for the delightful insight.
Yeah!!! He waited for the right time to realise his "dream".......to make it all the more worthwhile.....:)

Hmmmm........................*

shailendra said:
James Cameron turned down a chance to make “Avatar” for Twentieth Century Fox more than a decade ago to wait until technology caught up with his imagination. [Wohooo...I like that! :rock]

“Avatar” was shot using a dual-camera 3-D system that Cameron, 55, invented with partner Vince Pace after the director’s 1997 success with “Titanic,” the all-time top-grossing film.
Apparently Executives at Fox, (the studio that had also backed “Titanic,”) were willing to start work on “Avatar” almost right away after the huge success of the oscar winning movie...

Cameron didn’t think the technology was ready. He teamed with Pace, who specializes in making film equipment for tough locations, and spent 10 years developing a camera system that mimics the human eye to add realism to 3-D imagery. “Avatar” btw also is Cameron’s first feature film since the hugely successful “Titanic.”

Now that's what I call having a drive for something....for your dreams....... whew!!! :):):)
Click to expand...
 
karan said:
Hahahah...seems like Blondie Sidchhikara ka dil loot ley gaye. :eek:
Arrey kasai itna choh mein kyoon aavey se.......
Click to expand...

Yea Karan, I am offended ... I think all women should be like Megan Fox and Miss SC.:D:D Bahut badhiya ladkiyaan hein ... dekhte he jee raaji ho jya sei.
 
sidchhikara said:
Yea Karan, I am offended ... I think all women should be like Megan Fox and Miss SC.:D:D Bahut badhiya ladkiyaan hein ... dekhte he jee raaji ho jya sei.
Click to expand...

Arrey Daaki
kyon se jee ki baat kare se bhai. I concur though all women should be like Megan Fox and Miss SC for three months after that they should become part of men's folklore of his conquest. :D:D:D:D

Sid
Shailendra tey bhi bhooj ley, uska key vichaar se.:cool::cool:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top