Taboo Topic: Same sex relationships in Jats.

Thread pe thread "me lord" ...

Btw, who deleted your Thread? I personally thought it was hilarious. So what if people on the list did not want to be MODs, i do not think they (me included) object or take offence to the thread. We need more humor.

MODs, please restore Akshay's thread. I am hoping people will respond in jest and not seriously.

I don't care who deleted my thread and it does not matter. I never complain to mods everytime my post or thread is deleted. Mods do what they feel is good for JL. Yes it was hilarious....i put your name in there.

I started that thread in light mode not to offend anyone.
 
I don't care who deleted my thread and it does not matter. I never complain to mods everytime my post or thread is deleted. Mods do what they feel is good for JL. Yes it was hilarious....i put your name in there.

I started that thread in light mode not to offend anyone.

Too bad we lost the opportunity to get few laughs out of that thread.

There is an avenue, for people to slam MODs but no avenue to vent it about fellow members. Those I was one of the potential punch bag, I still liked the thread for its potential for humor.
 
App bilkul sahi na aap thekedar ho aur na main. Mera intent sawal ye tha, Jatland pe aate ho aur fir ye bhi kahte ho ki hume jatiwad (not explicitly i mean that) bhi nahi karna chahiye.
Thanks for posting the interesting question above about being a JL member yet not casteist. your question did add value as it helped carry the discussion forward.

Why I am on JL if I am against castism.
Firstly, To learn about and take pride in our heritage does not make us casteist, as long as it does not come at the expense of others and does not gives us false sense of casteist superiority. Nothing wrong in me being proud of being Jat or saying "jats are great people" but it will be wrong for me to say that "ONLY JATS" are great and all others are inferior. I can be proud of my heritage, yet not run others down, be respectful to other communities and engage them at par with equal respect without being dogmatic.

Secondly, caste is one of many things we use to define our identities e.g. Caste, nationality, religion, humanity, survivability, etc. Different people assign different weight to these factors to define their identity, no right or wrong allocations there, just different. This subconscious allocation of weightage also changes with time as we evolve with age, maturity, exposer, circumstances, etc. Caste for me is just one of many things that define my identity and it has lower weightage for me compared to other factors.

More in details here on post #36 http://www.jatland.com/forums/showt...-you-consider-them-Jatnis&p=257452#post257452

Lastly, I copied this from someone's FB status, this can be easily applied to doing various thing yet be jat, also can be applied to advocate why arent we more tolerant and supportive to GLBT. "Your car is Japanese. Your pizza is Italian. Your beer is (might be) German.Your wine is Spanish. Your democracy is Greek. Your coffee is Brazilian. Your tea is Chinese. Your watch is Swiss. Your fashion is French. Your shirt is Indian. Your shoes are Thai. Your radio is Korean.... Your vodka is Russian. And you complain about your neighbor being an immigrant (or not Jat-enough or GLBT)? Copy this if you are against racism."

(PS: वोह ठेकेदार वाली बात एस लिए लिख दी थि की इक बार मुझे लगा की आप यह प्रशन उठा रहे हैं की मुझे JL पर होने का हक नहीं है. सच्चाई ये है की थोडा खटका, लेकिन बुरा नहीं लगा, इस लिए क्लेअर कर रहा हूँ सब के सामने. शायद मुझे गलत महसूस हुआ, तोह फिर दुबारा से झमा परार्थी हूँ. शायद मुझे बात और अच्छे ढंग से कह देनी चाही ये थी. लेकिन अगर भाई तन्ने इस बात पे प्रशन किया है की मुझे यहाँ होने का क्या हक है तोह ये गलत है. भूल चुक माफ़ भाई)


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Filhal mujhe aap issi caregory mein lagte ho so carry on please.
Bhai, please elaborate. I did not completely understand you. Which category you are branding me in to? is it good? or bad? Are you encouraging? or are you discouraging? I am willing to listen and be discouraged based on evidence-backed reasoning, I am not अड़ियल टटू :)


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kahin maine padha tha, "jaisa dekhogey chitar vaisa hoga charitat and jaisa khaogey ann vaisa hoga mann" N for you i think both have changed so totally in synch with you.
Bhai, I am taking your statement in a positive light, please correct me if my interpretation is wrong. To me, you mean to say, environment and exposer etc influence us, our thinking and attitude. I agree with your statement. I use to be a dogmatic and conservative person and I gradually evolved into more progressive and liberal person due to exposer and my willingness to be open to evidence-based reasoning. I am just confirming your statement with my personal example :)


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bhai aap in genes ki maa behan karo and apne studies ko sahi mano. Meri ideology to byah bhi pani jati mein karne ki hai and wahi karunga.
Bhai, never say never, cuz we evolve with time. Kisi se bhi biyah kar, bhai tu razi rehna chahiye, hamari duwayen tere saath se. Ees baat pe tere ko eek gana dedicate kiya hai http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Gny2R18kUw (Jat ke pasand aagi, eeb tu jatno ho li)

"Jat Ke Ayi, Jatni Kehlayi" - jats have been practicing it for centuries (personally, it does not matter to me what they consider themselves, its up to individual to decide). Do not go by my views, go with evidence. Check out Ravi's post 34, my post 44 and 46 on the following thread"
http://www.jatland.com/forums/showt...ed-to-jat-guys...-do-you-consider-them-Jatnis


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bhai Tune naya naya likhna shuru kiya hai ye sab topic ki pahle bahut maa behan ho chuki hai tu laga rhaa hai...all the very best to you for this.
As long as these issues remain in the society, discussion will continue. If not by you or me then by others. Its a right thing to do. I do agree, if you have been part of it then too long then we may run the risk of intellectual-fatigue.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nothing personnel.
Of course, no offence taken. I completely understand your viewpoint and positive intent. I took your post in a positive light. भाई अड़े ऐकले सींग तुडान थोड़े ए न आये सा...here to learn and network in fun manner :)

Tu senti na ho ... kacche kaat आर यो गाना सुन ;) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f468Ox_v2HU
 
Last edited:
yes shibani,you are doing a gud job as a mother and so i am.I am very proud and happy as a mother.and please do not bring the things i have told in reply to someone else posts. I had to mention only after i was told the definition of offspring .I m on this forum for almost 6 yrs and ppl know how many times i have boasted about my qualification.i do not remember mentioning it even once.coming to anjoos thoughts and views she respects me a lot like a elder sister.i m happy with my perspective and totally respect your disagreement .I will do what we think is best for our child . QUOTE=Shibani;257510]“I m sure 99% of jatnis think the same way.”
The reason for me to come forward and respond to your call out to so call Jatnis is because I can relate to you at a few platforms:
First is just like yourself I am a mother.
Secondly academically I have completed a post grad degree (although it doesn't matter)
Third just like you I am living overseas.
I responded to your first response in the tread as well.
My prespective tough in regards to GLBT is different to yours. I concur with Anjuoo’s response it is your attitude that allows you to respect people in general and accept the differences/ deviants, before you weigh the evidences. Right? to the thread. I understand we all have to live with the morals laid down by the society but this society is evolving all the time, therefore reminding everyone to evolve and change. Living up to the society and morals is a hard task therefore I would rather choose my own path diligently and thoughtfully and keep my thought process open to adopt a change worth accepting.
Having said that I am endeavouring to raise a good human being. I will not be very concerned with his choice of partner till the time its a human being but I will be very concerned if he fails to treat his partner respectfully. I will not accept at any cost a son that is disrespecting of any human or living kind. If I achieve that I will be the happiest mother.
I am not going to burden him with anymore expectation. :)[/QUOTE]
 
Last edited:
Shibani ji,

Thank you for supporting my comment. Just a small disclaimer: My comment about the right attitude was meant for everyone, including myself....

To a large extent, I would agree with Ritu Di's comments. I am sure that initial reaction of every parent is that of a shock when they discover their child is a G/L/B/T. Sooner or later, they do come to terms with it and accept it, still no parent (however liberal) would be prepared for that kind of discovery.Wouldn't you agree?

BTW, you have a very endearing quality of idealism...:)....

Regards
yes shibani,you are doing a gud job as a mother and so i am.I am very proud and happy as a mother.and please do not bring the things i have told in reply to someone else posts. I had to mention only after i was told the definition of offspring .I m on this forum for almost 6 yrs and ppl know how many times i have boasted about my qualification.i do not remember mentioning it even once.coming to anjoos thoughts and views she respects me a lot like a elder sister.i m happy with my perspective and totally respect your disagreement .I will do what we think is best for our child . QUOTE=Shibani;257510]“I m sure 99% of jatnis think the same way.”
The reason for me to come forward and respond to your call out to so call Jatnis is because I can relate to you at a few platforms:
First is just like yourself I am a mother.
Secondly academically I have completed a post grad degree (although it doesn't matter)
Third just like you I am living overseas.
I responded to your first response in the tread as well.
My prespective tough in regards to GLBT is different to yours. I concur with Anjuoo’s response it is your attitude that allows you to respect people in general and accept the differences/ deviants, before you weigh the evidences. Right? to the thread. I understand we all have to live with the morals laid down by the society but this society is evolving all the time, therefore reminding everyone to evolve and change. Living up to the society and morals is a hard task therefore I would rather choose my own path diligently and thoughtfully and keep my thought process open to adopt a change worth accepting.
Having said that I am endeavouring to raise a good human being. I will not be very concerned with his choice of partner till the time its a human being but I will be very concerned if he fails to treat his partner respectfully. I will not accept at any cost a son that is disrespecting of any human or living kind. If I achieve that I will be the happiest mother.
I am not going to burden him with anymore expectation. :)
[/QUOTE]
 
Ram Ram Ji....
What my views are that many of us including me haven't had someone around us indulging in gay-les relationship....dhillon sir has gay friends,so he can understand them and can feel that they are not mental cases...for rest of us its still an aberrant behaviour
I,myself, can't think of marrying in same sex and i wish the same for my progeny..
 
Everybody has different opinions for life..let them live, and BTW it depends on the environment in they bought up and sometimes its natural also..Everybody is practical now a days, and Its a bitter truth that many of us adopted western culture in which no relation value..
 
Last edited:
Ram Ram Ji....
What my views are that many of us including me haven't had someone around us indulging in gay-les relationship....dhillon sir has gay friends,so he can understand them and can feel that they are not mental cases...for rest of us its still an aberrant behaviour
I,myself, can't think of marrying in same sex and i wish the same for my progeny..



ram ram bhai ram ram.....aaj america ke jhande naa chapwav ke.....yaaa chapne band hoge...mai teri signature lane ke baare me kah rahaa su.
 
Unki jarurt pe depand or passand pe depand karta hai unhe life main kya chaiye

Ismain burai hi kya hai:rock
 
as stated by mr.v dhillon that gayism happened because of genetic problem that is completely unauthentic nd unproved statement
no gene in human .D.N.A express the character of gayism....if anybody here a has good knowledge of science should understand the definition of species nor natual sex:
"its states that intercourse if happens between two members should resullt in an offspring".
or species definition" is a creature that can interbreed under natural condition".

a man and a man, a women d women by intercourse cant produce offspring...so even nature say that homosexuality is not natural.
HOMOSEXUALITY HAS EVOLVED BECAUSE OF PEOPLES OWN INTEREST ND IN MOST OF CASES IS A RESULT OF CHILD ABUSE.

a homosexual person is always distracted from natural course becuase of sm underlying problem that should be identified nd accordingly proper counselling nd rehabilitation should be done.
REMEMBER THAT NODODY IS BORN HOMOSEXUAL
ND EVERYBODY IS BORN HETEROSEXUAL.
if this problem cant be identified nd treated ..a day will come when human species will be in danger..
i just wnt to know who support homosexuality ....wt will be ur reaction when ur only son will come nd say to u..that papa i want to marry a boy ...that day u will realize that u supported a wrong thing...because that will be end of ur race and extinction of ur name from human species...nd that will be realy horrible...
 
Last edited:
if any girl interested in Girls to uski shaadi usse hi honi chaiye .........kyuki ager uski shadi kisi ladke se hogi to main nhi manta ki wo kuch din chal payyegi
same with boys ....................Gay kabi ek ladki ke sath kush nhi rhe sakta na hi ek ladki ko rhak sakta hai.

 
Centre opposes decriminalisation of homosexuality in SC

​
NEW DELHI: The Centre on Thursday opposed dilution of ​
Section 377
of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) by Delhi high court, which decriminalised sexual acts, in private, between consenting adults and urged the ​
Supreme Court
to reverse the landmark ruling. The UPA government told the Supreme Court that the HC had erred because a vast section of the Indian society still considered ​
homosexuality
immoral.

Gay sex "is highly immoral and against the social order," additional solicitor general PP Malhotra, who is representing the home ministry, told the apex court.

He added that it was "against nature and spreads HIV."

The ministry said it favoured the ban staying in place in order to prevent child abuse and because Indian society was largely against homosexuality according to a survey by the Law Commission, Malhotra explained. "Laws can't run separately from society and the morals of the time," he said.Hence, it appealed that the provision be retained in full to reflect the society's views. Though the Centre had not appealed against the judgement, the ministry of Home affairs came out strongly against the dilution of Section 377.When the Supreme Court asked who decided what was immoral, the Union government said society did so and argued that the Indian laws could not but reflect the views of its society. The government said the HC considered only judgements of foreign countries where homosexuality may not be resented.

"Our moral and social values are different from other countries and we cannot be guided by them,' the home ministry told the court.

The ​
Delhi high court
on July 2, 2009, had delivered a historic judgement to amend a 149-year-old colonial-era law - Section 377 of the IPC - and decriminalise private consensual sex between adults of the same sex. The judgment was seen as the biggest victory yet for gay rights.

The two judge bench had held: "If there is one constitutional tenet that can be said to be underlying theme of the Indian Constitution, it is that of 'inclusiveness'. This Court believes that Indian Constitution reflects this value deeply ingrained in Indian society, nurtured over several generations. The inclusiveness that Indian society traditionally displayed, literally in every aspect of life, is manifest in recognising a role in society for everyone. Those perceived by the majority as "deviants' or 'different' are not on that score excluded or ostracised.

Where society can display inclusiveness and understanding, such persons can be assured of a life of dignity and non-discrimination. This was the 'spirit behind the Resolution' of which Nehru spoke so passionately. In our view, Indian Constitutional law does not permit the statutory criminal law to be held captive by the popular misconceptions of who the LGBTs are. It cannot be forgotten that discrimination is antithesis of equality and that it is the recognition of equality which will foster the dignity of every individual."​
 
I am unable to understand where we are going and planning to reach.How much time we are having to waste for such type of worthless topic.Man & Women are best example of GOD'S creation and he put sex in between those for continuation of human bodies.Using sex for pleasure is job of Not working people like PrithviRaj Chauhan after him only we faced 1000 years of Ghulami ( Independence).
Geniune and working people only does sex for giving birth to new jeev, rest of time they are spending their time in some constructive issues. I never saw my dadaji at home after my birth. He used to stay at Gher ( In Village House and Gher are different places) But now a days people are getting money without efforts and unable to sleep.This generation is not working hard and you will found them in house only. In villages also you will find all people at home only and sleeping.Such type of people only required Liquor, pills or sex to sleep.
Plus now a days Call center culture is running in our society and boys & girls are earning good handsome money with high stress.After returning home their body is not too much tired but their brain asked some pleasure and those generation is using such tactics to relieve their stresses.
I don't want to allobtrate this topic much becuase talking on this topic unneccassry hurts somebody.
But only my suggestion to our society is that be like you born and follow rule of nature. IF YOU HARM NATURE IT WILL ALSO HARM YOU NOT IMMEDIATELY BUT DEFINATELY.
 
@Vipin: Vipin what does "shiv ling" symbolizes? Is it some body part of Shiv or something else? If it symbolizes a body part then what is the point in worshiping it. Isn't it better to worship the entire statue of the deity instead of just one body part, if beneficial at all.

As per historical evidence, shiv ling cannot be body part as in early history, there were faces of deities sculpted on it.

Here are some photos of shivlings from history with deity faces on it.
http://www.jatland.com/forums/showthread.php?36568-Cultural-changes-from-history-upto-present-times
 
Last edited:
As per historical evidence, shiv ling cannot be body part as in early history, there were faces of deities sculpted on it.

Urmila Ji, if it is not a body part then what it is after all? What historical significance does this unique figure have, warranting its idolization. Can you throw some light on the genesis of this worshiping. I do not see any scientific reasoning in blindly maintaining certain traditions of idol worship.
 
I believe most of us are not hostile towards LGT community.

That said, wherever it has become socially the norm and increasing Ie Western Europe America what you find is Population starts decreasing. In UK bisexual relationships between women are now seen as the norm meaning Women can and will say " we no longer need men" vica versa for males.

You do not notice in 1 generation, but as two three decades pass you see Birth rates drop that marks the decline of a Civilisation.

So all in all do what you want. We do not wish harm or pain to anyones sexuality, but be mindful of the World you live in.

That is why Russians and East Europeans are shown as violently opposing LGT, its not out of hatred. Its because they know whats happening in America and W Europe will eventually decline their civilisations. Just like Jaats Jatts were frontier tribal societies facing invaders, the East Europeans have faced similar situations which makes them Tribal like us.
 
As per historical evidence, shiv ling cannot be body part as in early history, there were faces of deities sculpted on it.


Notwithstanding your opinion, I think there was no need to revive this thread since it contains a controversial topic, unfit for Indian society.


.
 
Perhaps ShivLing was used as a spiritual symbol to indicate the existence of God, who perhaps is not of a human form. Some religious practices world over still do believe that god is beyond human form and is a spiritual being. It is common practice among some meditators to remember god without having to have an idol in front of them.


Urmila Ji, if it is not a body part then what it is after all? What historical significance does this unique figure have, warranting its idolization. Can you throw some light on the genesis of this worshiping. I do not see any scientific reasoning in blindly maintaining certain traditions of idol worship.
 
Back
Top