You are a free citizen of a free country. A country where we can do and say whatever without providing the basis of whatever we are saying.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Why so much sympathy on Bangladesh??????????????
- Thread starter rajpaldular
- Start date
The fact remains - not undertaken by Indian Hindus.
Indian Tamils and Hindus were involved. Read more.
You are a free citizen of a free country. A country where we can do and say whatever without providing the basis of whatever we are saying.
I agree. The latter part fits you better though.
The fact remains that it was not on religious/fanatical lines as undertaken by the Sikhs or the Muslims where religion and its tenets take precedence over everything, even life.
Indian Tamils and Hindus were involved. Read more.
To see the smile on your face, even for a short while, I wish that were the case. But unfortunately that is not the case.
I agree. The latter part fits you better though.
The fact remains that it was not on religious/fanatical lines as undertaken by the Sikhs or the Muslims where religion and its tenets take precedence over everything, even life.
Still terrorism.
Terrorism but not religion or fanaticism based.
Doesn't matter. Check those dictionaries of yours for the definition of terrorism.
Those are not my dictionaries and neither are the definitions of the word terrorism mentioned there as per my liking, insistence or convenience. I have already checked them. There is a deviation in your definition from that in the dictionary. Hence, you need to correct your understanding of the same.
Also look forward to your reply whether Congress is the biggest terrorist in this country considering the number of riots that have taken place under its misrule.
Also look forward to your reply whether Congress is the biggest terrorist in this country considering the number of riots that have taken place under its misrule.
Doesn't matter. Check those dictionaries of yours for the definition of terrorism.
Those are not my dictionaries and neither are the definitions of the word terrorism mentioned there as per my liking, insistence or convenience. I have already checked them. There is a deviation in your definition from that in the dictionary. Hence, you need to correct your understanding of the same.
Also look forward to your reply whether Congress is the biggest terrorist in this country considering the number of riots that have taken place under its misrule.
Share your definition.
I can use all three. Two are dead, so the one alive gets all the attention.
Compared to Rajiv, IG can probably be seen as a bigger enemy by Sikhs. The party however hardly fits into one mould.
Btw, I hope all this off-topic discussion is leading somewhere.
you have not answered the question yet? Because of 2002 you compared Modi with hitler a lot of times. Do you compare Rajiv with hitler for 1984 ???
Indian Tamils and Hindus were involved. Read more.
Do you know Tamil muslims from Jaffna were also with LTTE ? So don't give it a religious color like Khalistan or Islamic Jehad, it was ethnic not religious. But i agree it was terrorism.
As you are quite vocal to give a perspective or reason for Muslim & Sikhs anti Indian activities in the past & present , I hope you also know about LTTE perspective.
Do you know Tamil muslims from Jaffna were also with LTTE ? So don't give it a religious color like Khalistan or Islamic Jehad, it was ethnic not religious. But i agree it was terrorism.
As you are quite vocal to give a perspective or reason for Muslim & Sikhs anti Indian activities in the past & present , I hope you also know about LTTE perspective.
I do. What makes you think I don't? And as I mentioned earlier, I understand different perspectives.
Since you brought up the Lankan Tamil issue and the IPKF, I can even tell you that the sycophantic and anti-national Sikh regiment Sikh LI were involved in multiple operations especially one where they were ambushed and their Helis left after dropping them in a school (I think). Where do I know this? I have been a member of online defence forums since 2008, though my participation has declined recently.
I was always talking about terrorism in general. Giving it sub-categories - religious, political is just a way to suit them to one's argument by hook or by crook.
Last edited:
Nope, not yet. I don't know about him that well.you have not answered the question yet? Because of 2002 you compared Modi with hitler a lot of times. Do you compare Rajiv with hitler for 1984 ???
Modi and his bhakts remind me of Hitler and the Nazis due to not only due to the porgom or genocidal tendencies but a variety of reasons - close resemblance to fascism, Nazi like hardline cadre support prone to violence -RSS, demogoguery, mass hysteria, bias against those perceived as non sons of soil philosophy etc.
Again an unsubstantiated allegation!
How are Modi supporters prone to violence??
How are Modi supporters prone to violence??
Nope, not yet. I don't know about him that well.
Modi and his bhakts remind me of Hitler and the Nazis due to not only due to the porgom or genocidal tendencies but a variety of reasons - close resemblance to fascism, Nazi like hardline cadre support prone to violence -RSS, demogoguery, mass hysteria, bias against those perceived as non sons of soil philosophy etc.
Nope, not yet. I don't know about him that well.
Modi and his bhakts remind me of Hitler and the Nazis due to not only due to the porgom or genocidal tendencies but a variety of reasons - close resemblance to fascism, Nazi like hardline cadre support prone to violence -RSS, demogoguery, mass hysteria, bias against those perceived as non sons of soil philosophy etc.
Great. You don't know him well even after 5000 Sikhs murdered mercilessly by his party cadres under his watch. Then he says once a big tree falls earth shakes.
You know You are trapped because of ur biased & selective approach and now you just want to get out of it.
By dodging to compare Rajiv with Hitler & comparing Modi with him repeatedly . You are not only doing injustice with your community but also showing ur ungrateful attitude towards right wing which saves many Sikhs from Rajiv & his goons in 1984. Those who saved are facist n those who killed you are not sure about them. Lol.
Last edited:
It would be highly unreasonable to draw a parallel between the Sikh militants/terrorists and Sikh soldiers of the Indian Army who are bound by their oath of allegiance to the Indian constitution and which cannot be doubted. Sikh terrorists on the other hand in a very narrow and unreal interpretation of their faith owed allegiance to their leaders who were no more than hatred mongers and rabble rousers.
Over ages and centuries even Hindus have taken up arms but that was not on religious lines, but either for territorial or other claims or against Jehadis who undertook to wipe out the Kafirs. Let's not forget that Sikhism arose from Hindus and under the various Gurus undertook to protect the non-muslims from the onslaught of the religious tyranny of the Mughal rulers.
Over ages and centuries even Hindus have taken up arms but that was not on religious lines, but either for territorial or other claims or against Jehadis who undertook to wipe out the Kafirs. Let's not forget that Sikhism arose from Hindus and under the various Gurus undertook to protect the non-muslims from the onslaught of the religious tyranny of the Mughal rulers.
I do. What makes you think I don't? And as I mentioned earlier, I understand different perspectives.
Since you brought up the Lankan Tamil issue and the IPKF, I can even tell you that the sycophantic and anti-national Sikh regiment Sikh LI were involved in multiple operations especially one where they were ambushed and their Helis left after dropping them in a school (I think). Where do I know this? I have been a member of online defence forums since 2008, though my participation has declined recently.
I was always talking about terrorism in general. Giving it sub-categories - religious, political is just a way to suit them to one's argument by hook or by crook.
Great. You don't know him well even after 5000 Sikhs murdered mercilessly by his party cadres under his watch. Then he says once a big tree falls earth shakes.
You know You are trapped because of ur biased & selective approach and now you just want to get out of it.
By dodging to compare Rajiv with Hitler & comparing Modi with him repeatedly . You are not only doing injustice with your community but also showing ur ungrateful attitude towards right wing which saves many Sikhs from Rajiv & his goons in 1984. Those who saved are facist n those who killed you are not sure about them. Lol.
Of course, reading Manoj Mitta/Phoolka's and Kirpal Dhillon's books on the topic hasn't taught me enough. I bow to thee greatness.
Of course, reading Manoj Mitta/Phoolka's and Kirpal Dhillon's books on the topic hasn't taught me enough. I bow to thee greatness.
Right. The greatness comes with writing name of books you read & forums you been member of. It doesn't matter what you say or think.
I again repeat the question if Modi is Hitler for 2002 , the same rule is applied to Rajiv for 1984 & you consider him Hitler ? Does Phoolka book deny murders of Sikhs by Congress cadres under his watch ? Does Phoolka like you say that he is sure Modi is Hitler but not sure about Rajiv ?
PS : BJP/right wing/Hindu nationalist/saffron fascists saved many sikhs from tyranny of Congress & its Hitler in 1984 and you know it is said by you in some other post.
Last edited: