2G scam, Raja, Media, Radia and tapes

Another letter from finance minitry on 2G scam....

Another letter from finance minitry on 2G scam comes out....


http://www.bhaskar.com/article/NAT-2g-new-letter-can-create-problem-for-centre-2532805.html?HT3=

PC-Pranab war repeat?


1.76 लाख करोड़ रुपये के 2 जी स्पेक्ट्रम घोटाले में संकट से घिरी सरकार की मुश्किलें और बढ़ सकती हैं। मीडिया में आई एक नई चिट्ठी सरकार के लिए मुसीबत का सबब बन सकती है। यह चिट्ठी 23 मार्च, 2011 को वित्त मंत्रालय के अतिरिक्त सचिव बी. जुल्का की तरफ से लिखी गई है, जिस पर वित्तमंत्री प्रणब मुखर्जी के हस्ताक्षर हैं। नई चिट्ठी में इस बात का जिक्र है कि प्रधानमंत्री कार्यालय को 2 जी स्पेक्ट्रम घोटाले को लेकर सूचना दी जाए। इस चिट्ठी के बाद ही वित्त मंत्रालय की एक चिट्ठी 25 मार्च, 2011 को प्रधानमंत्री कार्यालय को भेजी गई, जिसमें कहा गया था कि पी. चिदंबरम चाहते तो राजा को स्पेक्ट्रम आवंटन से रोक सकते थे।
 
Court Rejects Bail to Kanimozhi, 7 Others

"Dashing the hopes of DMK MP Kanimozhi and seven other accused in the 2G case, a Delhi court today dismissed their bail pleas saying the charges levelled against them were of "grave nature"."

"Accused Kanimozhi Karunanithi belongs to upper echelons of society and is also a member of Parliament. By no stretch of imagination, she can be said to be suffering from any discrimination on the ground of being a woman," he said.

Dismissing Morani's submission that he was sick and was not in good health and should be granted bail as per section 437 of the Cr PC, the judge said the medical records do not suggests that "standard of illness of Morani is so high as to categorise his custody as detrimental to his health."

The grounds on which the bails are rejected give a face to Indian judiciary. Bail have been misused by the powerfuls but not this time. Please read through below articles.



http://news.outlookindia.com/items.aspx?artid=740251

http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article2594061.ece?homepage=true
 
डॉ सुब्रमनियन स्वामी इस विडियो में कई सारे घोटालों के बारे में बताते हैं. डॉ स्वामी 2G घोटाला, बोफोर्स घोटाला, जाली नोट घोटाला इत्यादि के बारे में बताते हैं. डॉ स्वामी बताते हैं कि देश का सबसे अधिक काला धन सोनिया गाँधी के नाम जमा है. जो कि १,००,००० करोड़ रुपये है. दूसरे नंबर पर पी. चिदंबरम आता है. उस के स्विस अकाउंट में ५०,००० करोड़ रुपये जमा है.
डॉ स्वामी बताते हैं कि 2G स्पेक्ट्रम घोटाले में ६०,००० करोड़ ...रुपये ए. राजा ने घूस में लिए. जिसमें उसने इस प्रकार से पैसे को वितरित किया:-

सोनिया गाँधी - ३६००० करोड़ रुपये

पी. चिदंबरम - ५००० करोड़ रुपये

एम. करूणानिधि - १५००० करोड़ रुपये

ए. राजा - शेष बचे हुए ४००० करोड़ रुपये.

डॉ स्वामी बताते हैं कि उन्होंने २००८ में मनमोहन सिंह को ए. राजा के 2G से सम्बंधित अनियमितताओं के बारे में ५ पत्र लिखे. परन्तु जब उन्हें कोई भी उत्तर नहीं मिला तब विवश होकर उन्हें सुप्रीम कोर्ट जाना पड़ा. वो बताते हैं कि ये सारे 2G के लाइसेन्स भारत के शत्रु देशों द्वारा संचालित कंपनियों को दिया गया है, जिससे देश की सुरक्षा पर बहुत बड़ा संकट उत्पन्न हो चुका है.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aB_1kfLLR6Q
 
Fresh Crisis On Chidambaram, Opposition Demands His Exit After Delhi Court Allows Swa

Fresh Crisis On Chidambaram, Opposition Demands His Exit After Delhi Court Allows Swamy To Depose


New Delhi, Dec 8, 2011 : Both houes of Parliament witnessed uproar on Thursday as opposition members, particularly of BJP and JD-U, demanded the resignation of Home Minister P Chidambaram, within minutes of a Delhi court allowing Janata Party chief Dr Subramanian Swamy to depose about Chidambaram's role in the 2G case.

The CBI court allowed Swamy to depose as a witness and lead further evidence in support of his private complaint against Union Home Minister P Chidambaram in the 2G spectrum case.

“Complainant Dr Subramanian Swamy is permitted to recall himself as complainant witness one for leading further evidence,” Special CBI Judge O P Saini said.
The court told Swamy that the list of witnesses, which he had filed with his application, for summoning some senior CBI officials and other public servants to press his case would be allowed only after he could explain the relevance of their testimony.

“Other witnesses as mentioned in the list of witnesses filed with the application, shall be allowed to be summoned only after relevance of their testimony is explained by the complainant (Swamy),” the court said.
The judge said Swamy could lead evidence in support of his complaint as he has referred to the role of other conspirators in it.

“In view of the facts that complainant was not aware of the identity of additional proposed accused (s) at the time of filing of complaint, but has now come to know about it, he is not prevented in law from leading evidence on this point, more so, when he has referred to the role of other conspirators in his complaint,” the judge said.

The court directed Swamy to appear in the witness box on December 17 to lead further evidence in support of his complaint against Chidambaram.

The court had on December 3 reserved its order on Swamy’s plea seeking permission to examine himself afresh, senior CBI officials and others to prove that Chidambaram had taken a joint decision with former Telecom Minister A Raja regarding fixing the price for 2G spectrum.

He had claimed that Chidambaram, as the then Finance Minister, had permitted Swan Telecom and Unitech, who had secured the licences, to sell their shares to foreign companies.

Both houses of Parliament had to be adjourned after NDA members demanded Chidambaram's resignation on the issue.
Question hour could not be taken up in both houses, with BJP and JD-U members demanding Chidambaram's resignation.Both houses were first adjourned till noon, and afterwards till 2 PM.

DMK member T R Baalu was heard demanding a discussion on the Mullaperiyar dam issue in Parliament while some other members trooped into the Well and raised slogans.

BJP members continued to raise slogans ‘Griha Mantri Istifa Do (Home Minister resign)’ from their seats.

BJP leader Murli Manohar Joshi later told reporters that since a Delhi court has taken note of this, there should be a probe. “In this situation, Chidambaram should submit his resignation on his own, or else the Prime Minister should sack him,” he said.

Ahead of the Winter Session, the NDA had decided to boycott Chidambaram in Parliament, alleging his involvement in the 2G scam during his tenure as Finance Minister. The NDA wants Chidambaram to quit.indiatvnews.com
 
चिदंबरम पर पद के दुरुपयोग का आरोप!
गृहमंत्री रहते हुए चिदंबरम पर अपने पद का दुरूपयोग एवं "conflict of interest" का मामला सामने आया है | और कितने प्रमाण चाहिए इस चिपकू को इस्तीफा देने के लिए. शर्म भी कोई चीज होती है.

http://navbharattimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/11118105.cms

चिदंबरम ने जिस मामले को ख़ारिज करने की सिफारिश की थी उसको दिल्ली के उपराज्यपाल ने वापस खोलने का आदेश दिया है. ये मामला चिदंबरम के पूर्व साथी का है जिसके चिदंबरम वकील हुआ करते थे.
 
jakhar77 said:
Friend, father & philosopher of black money is Chidambaram-

http://www.sunday-guardian.com/analysis/friend-father-a-philosopher-of-black-money-is-chidambaram
Click to expand...

Congress party has always been benefiting it's own kind , "the looters".
Way back when it came to power, it had come out for loan waiver scheme for farmers. The looters who had no intention of paying back got benefited and those who had worked day and hard to payback their loans only cried in vain "it's not fair".

No wonder, congress party is father, mother and teacher of corruption. I pray for it's elimination, it is worse then any terrorist organization.
 
Last edited:
There have been 3 verdicts by the courts on 2G scam. One was about the delay in granting permission to prosecute Mr. Raja by the PM, second, the cancellation of the 122 licenses and third, dismissal of S. Swami’s petition in trial court to make Mr. PC a co-accused.

The first verdict says that PM (PMO) delayed its decision for 16 months where usually it takes -3-4 months to decide. The court goes on saying that the PMO is responsible not the PM. I am quite amazed that how a person at the top of the institution can shrug off the responsibility? The PMO works for the PM not vice versa. The govt. says the PMO is indicted not the PM. The PM is not aware about what is happening in his office? This was not a small scale issue, it was being raised by newspapers, individuals etc.

Second verdict, cancels 122 licenses but still the criminal liability has to be established in the trial court, the licenses are cancelled because there was illegality in the policy, its implementation and there was malafide. If you take this decision to the trail court, the crime has already been proved so now the trial court will just decide who the criminal was. Is the trail court not responsible to establish the crime as well?
In my opinion, the decision by Supreme Court is going to affect the decision of the trial court.
Second thing comes out of this decision is, there was prima facie fraud in the allotment of spectrum and licenses. There were many news articles in newspapers even before the allotment, were the people in govt. sleeping and could not sense that something was wrong?

Wouldn’t have there been an inquiry by the govt. itself?

Then, when the allotment was done, petitions from individuals were not heard, PM says CBI was inquiring to decide on S. swami’s application, why did it take 16 months to investigate this case for CBI?

Third verdict, the trial court says Mr. PC cannot be held responsible for the 2G scam, one side the supreme court says that advice of the PM and the then FM were not heard by Raja but the trial court in its decision says merely holding meeting with Raja cannot hold PC criminally liable in the scam. If 2 people are meeting to take a decision on something, they take a decision and go to the higher authority that we have taken the best decision and want your go ahead signal, the higher authority gives the signal and decision is implemented. It turns out to be wrong decision, the court cancels the decision. How come only one person be held responsible when there were at least 3 people were involved, 2 of them were actually reached to decision together?
The question before the trial court was to establish that there was prima facie evidence against PC and not to examine the criminality. Establishment to criminal liability is done when charge sheeted like what is happening with Raja and his associates. A decision taken by 2 persons, one is being trialed and another one is not even considered prima facie accused?

I do not say that I am law person, its my general assessment and my perception of the events and the verdicts. It may be wrong but somewhere I feel that only one person can not be blamed. The principle of collective responsibility must be considered here. Was Raja not following what the PM and FM were saying? If so then who was his boss? Whose orders was he following? I am sure Raja himself wouldn't have been able to twist and play a big game like this alone.
If a minister in the cabinet doesn't listen to the PM then does he be allowed to continue in the cabinet? The coalition govt. can not be made a shield to shy away from the responsibility. If not criminal, at least moral and political responsibility must be shared by the whole govt. including the PM.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top