“Who Shall Live” by Victor R. Fuchs, was a required reading in my graduate work at Yale. Readership of this book is recommended for undergraduates in economics, sociology, and public policy; and for graduates in medicine, public health, and public policy; and physicians and other health professionals.
In his book Victor R. Fuchs draws on his deep understanding of the strengths and limitations of economics and his intimate knowledge of health care institutions to help readers understand the problems every nation faces in trying to allocate health resources efficiently and equitably. His intension for writing this book was for the health professionals, policy makers, social scientists, students and concerned citizens to benefit from the knowledge dealing with national health insurance, poverty and health, and other social policy issues.
Although this book is written with special emphasis on health care, its metaphoric economic analysis is applicable to social problems of national concern as to who shall live and who shall die from lack of health care or other necessities of life. The book provokes one to assimilate this understanding to other social and ethical issues facing the public moralists in every nation today. Therefore, the question is not “Who is a mercenary?” But “Why does one become a mercenary?”
The anatomy of one’s decisions, as to “What” “How” “When” or “Why” one leaves his village, hometown, or his country, is based on these social, personal, and economical circumstances, and not on high moral grounds! As far as the conscience, sense of patriotism and allegiance to one’s country go, it is a romantic notion that goes out of window the moment you hit reality, and separate fact from fiction. There is nothing immoral about bettering one’s life as long as it is not tainted with immorality. Perhaps this one significant and highly publicized death will catapult the issues of social, political and economical importance to the forefront of the national policies? Who knows it might even serve as a wake up call for the Indian administration? As some one has said earlier somewhere, no death is less tragic!
Having said that there are expatriate philanthropists who have never lost sight of their roots and have continued contributing one way or another; and then there are hardcore patriots who, having abused the already depleting premium national resources have amounted to nothing more than corrupt, immoral agents, plaguing the very society in which they live. Which one of them will you pick to have committed treason?