Jai ho Ram bhag van ki

Status
Not open for further replies.
very true

rkumar said:
Looks like thread is still open. I can very well imagine that humour was the objective of this thread. However, on a serious note, there is no doubt that Lord Rama was the greatest leader which human history has ever produced. Think of two young brothers wondering in far way jungles and how they mobilised the local population to fight with the most mighty king Ravan of that period. One might give credit to Hanuman and others for many missions, but truth is otherwise. If Hanuman was so capable without Lord Rama, how come he could not help his best friend Sugreev ? Why that Hanuman and Sugreev had to live in hiding in Kiskindha mountain range? If Hanuman was such a capable person that he could retieve the wives of others, why he could not get the wife of Sugreev relieved from Bali? We all know that Hanuman never claimed to be so capable and considered it all as blessings of Lord Rama.

Topic can be interesting if members are willing to have a healthy debate, may be under another thread. I am not a religious person. However, I am a great admirer of Lord Rama because he was really the Maryada Prushottam.

Rajendra
satyemev jayte
true words, but its sad that there is a need for explanation to be given for Maryada Prushottam shri Ram.
but that doesnt take away the credit from you coz there are people who need to be educated in this.
hanuman ji is also Lord Ram 's bhakt like us, he was fortunate that he got a chance to serve his master. it doesnt make a difference if one worships Lord Ram or Hanuman ji.
narwal
 
Dekho inn bhagwaanon ki kissi machai rail
Koe kum koe jyada sei...Khellan laagge khel

Khellan lagge khell hava ya kissi chalai
Koe kahe hanuman badda koe de Ram duhai

Uppar aala dekh-2 ke hanssta hoga
Dekho na bhagwaan bhi chhodya pooja jogga

Dil jiska ho saaf hudde bhagwaan samawein
Pappi mann ke dhorre batta kyun bhagwan aawein.

Baat chali bhagwaan ki kehna padde jaroor
Karre nafrat jo insaan se, ho ishwar se duur

Jitne bhi bhagwwan sien, Saare sein awtaar
Aayye thhe iss dharti par, taran uska bhaar.
 
Last edited:
Technical help needed

I thought why to start a new thread , so askin here.

I have changed my profile pic but its coming up too small. Can anyone help me to make it fit the full frame. Thanks!
 
Dev bhisaab this one fits the bill here !



devdahiya said:
Dekho inn bhagwaanon ki kissi machai rail
Koe kum koe jyada sei...Khellan laagge khel

Khellan lagge khell hava ya kissi chalai
Koe kahe hanuman badda koe de Ram duhai

Uppar aala dekh-2 ke hanssta hoga
Dekho na bhagwaan bhi chhodya pooja jogga

Dil jiska ho saaf hudde bhagwaan samawein
Pappi mann ke dhorre batta kyun bhagwan aawein.

Baat chali bhagwaan ki kehna padde jaroor
Karre nafrat jo insaan se, ho ishwar se duur

Jitne bhi bhagwwan sien, Saare sein awtaar
Aayye thhe iss dharti par, taran uska bhaar.
 
yar Rana, ur sign says the whole thing clearly. Thats what I believe in mate.
Insaniyat sabse bada dharam hai.

gagan_rana said:
Lets add more interest to this thread.....

....Well, hamarae Hindu Dharm mai....84 lakh bhag-van hai... koi kassee ka bhai hai.. to koi keesa dadee.... Isn't interesting..... What a super hit story... who ever had written should be rewarded or put into jail...... YOU DECIDE...

We believe in Superpower however 84 lac ....can we justfy that....

.....Letschellenge our thinking, our prejudice and way of thinking....

Note: Religion, God and ethics are important to stop animal human to become animal..... otherwise there will be brutal chaos.
 
Koi baat na Gagan Bhai...Ebb rolla na karaan....Na to yoh Deepak bhai poorey thread pe kainchee chala dega...bhai es thread mein bahoot humor aur gyaan bhara sei....Delete nahi howan dengey..

Wasie Deepak Bhai....woh Deleted portion jara mail mein bhej dyo Dev Sir ne, Gagan Bhai ne aar Menne.... :D:D

Laage Raho....Thread Bandh nahi hona chahiye....ladayee pher bhi kar laangey....saare apne e sein...aar k kite jaana sei Jatland Chhod ke...kiddin....:D:D

Cheers,
Anil

gaganjat said:
Davendar bhai, internet pai kit ka rolla, hum tai asli rolla karania sai ;)
Baki acche galya tai acche hi hai
 
gaganjat said:
..... Ravan was a scholar and Ram always acted as a anpadh - gawar.

...

Hi Gagan,

I thought this point brought by you needs the real debate. There is no doubt that Ravan was a very knowledgeable person. However, this alone is not enough to qualify him as a great man. Ravan lacked common human traits, which makes a person great. Let us compare Ravan and Ram on few human traits as the benchmarks;

1. Relations with Brothers:; Ram treated his younger brothers with extreme love and care as we all know. However, same cannot be said about Ravan. We all know, how he treated Vibhishan. If we read in between the lines, his treatment to Kumbhakaran can be questioned. I won't be surprised if he intoxicated Kumbhakarn with some thing to make him sleep for months. Ravan was so proudly of his knowledge that he never gave any importance to the advice of others. On the contrary, Ram was democratic and listened to every opinion.

2. Treatment to women: Ram Treated every women, including Kekai, with the highest possible respect. He tried his best to accommodate every wish of his mother, wife and even other woman like Shabri where he enjoyed eating her beirs. Ravan never listened even to his wife Mandodri. If Ravan was truly a scholar and brave man, he should have never kidnapped Sita in disguise of a hermit. He should have gone into direct war with Ram or possibly should have kidnapped Laxman who cut the nose of his sister Supnakha. His kidnapping of Sita alone proves that he was neither a brave man nor a scholar who deserves admiration.

I can go on point wise and compare Ram and Ravan. I cannot think a single point on which Ravan seems to score over Ram. One might come under the illusion that Ravan had very advanced technology and defeated Devtas. Every great Yoddha of Ravan was defeated and killed decisively and that should prove that Ram had much more superior war technology. People often argue that Ram killed Ravan based upon the information Vibhishan provided to Ram. Information alone would not have helped Ram to kill Ravan. Nabhi of a person is a very small spot on the body and can be protected easily from enemy attacks. Think of Ram as a warier and how he could attack Ravan at his Nabhi, which was a highly mobile and very small target. Ram never lured Vibhishan to his camp. It was the poor treatment given by Ravan, which made Vibhishan leave Lanka and join Ram's side. Ravan was nothing more a spoiled genius and at best can be called a dictator. Like Hitler he had the knowledge and technology, but no human values.

Rajendra
 
Om Bhagwate Vasudevaye Namah:

Sab Prabhu ki lila hai, Ravan ko mratu loak ( Earth ) pe kisne bheja, Shri Ram Ji kiska avtar the, Shri Ram Ji ko vanvaas ku hua, Supranakha ki naak ku kati, Mareech mrigh banke ram ki kutiya mein ku aaya , Sita Mata ne Shri Ram ko mrigh kopakad ke lane ki iccha ku jatai , Shri Ram mrigh ke peeche ku bhaage , Laxman ku bachane gaya, Ravan ku Sita Mata ko haran karke le gaya, Jatayu ku beech mein aaya, Hanuman ji ku beech mein aaye ( May be Hanuman ji was a JAT as most of the peoples says " Dusare ki beewi ko dhundhne ke liye apni punch mein aag lagane ka kaam ek JAT hi kar sakta hai"), Shri Ram ji ne sabri ke ber ku khaye , Sugreev ne Shri Ram ji ki madad ku ki, Hanuman ji ne apni punch mein aag ku lagai , Angad ne apni tanng Lanka mein ku jamai, Vibhishan ne Ravan ke sath gaddari ku ki , Megnaad (Inderjeet) ne Laxman ko murchit ku kiya, Hanuman Ji ku sanjeevani buti ke sath sath parvat utha kar leke aaye, Kumbhkaran ko need se ku uthaya gaya , Ravan ko Shri Ram Ji ne ku Mara.

In sab ke peeche ek hi chaliya hai aur wo hi param satya hai teeno loakon per usi ka raaj hai .

Sab uski hi iccha se hota hai Bhagwan "VISHNU", "SHRI RAM", "SHRI KRISHNA" kisi bhi roop mein dekh lo hain ek hi.

Hum sab ku aapse mein behas kar rahe hain ye bhi usi ke ishre per ho raha hai.

Sab Milke bolo " OM BHAGWATE VASUDEVAYE NAMAH: "
 
sejwaldeepak said:
Sab uski hi iccha se hota hai Bhagwan "VISHNU", "SHRI RAM", "SHRI KRISHNA" kisi bhi roop mein dekh lo hain ek hi.

Hum sab ku aapse mein behas kar rahe hain ye bhi usi ke ishre per ho raha hai.

Sab Milke bolo " OM BHAGWATE VASUDEVAYE NAMAH: "




Jamma sachchi aur kammal baat kahi bhai.
 
Ram and Sita maas nahi khate the

sejwaldeepak said:
Sab Prabhu ki lila hai, Ravan ko mratu loak ( Earth ) pe kisne bheja, Shri Ram Ji kiska avtar the, Shri Ram Ji ko vanvaas ku hua, Supranakha ki naak ku kati, Mareech mrigh banke ram ki kutiya mein ku aaya , Sita Mata ne Shri Ram ko mrigh ka maas khane ki iccha ku jatai ( Kya bhagwaan bhi maas khate the ?)



Ram Ji maas nahi khate the...and Sita ne unko mrig ko jivit lane ke liye bola tha ....she said she likes that animal and she will enjoy having that mrig in her palace. and she said even if the mrig dies iski mrigchaal bhee kaam me aa sakti hai....but there was no intention of killing it and eat it afterwards.

and Ram who was a great warior could have killed a mrig easily...he wanted to capture him alive and isi vajaha se unko wapise aane me deri ho gayi thee jiska Ravan ne fayda uthaya tha.....Ravan me inti bahaduri nahi thee ki woh akele Ram and Lakshman ke presence me sita ka kuch bigad sake...tabhee chupke akele me chaliya ka vesh bana ke aaya thaa....and jhuth bolkar sita ko kidnap karke le gaya thaa.....

I think we all need to think about it and read the Ramayan carefully and not the way we are being forced to believe it. Believe me it will make all us proud of our old culture. I am sure if we all discuss it and realize the truth it would be good for all.
 
Yo thread record banaweiga......ibb hadde Ramlila hogi...ha...ha...ha. Manne kahi thi re Gagan...ke tera Naam Limca Book mei jaroor aaweiga iss thread ke chakkar mei. Lagge raho bhai....thha dyo dhumma katti.
 
sejwaldeepak said:
Thanks Arun,

I forgot that part thats why written the wrong thing , now i have changed .


Bhai Deepak...I am glad you like it... maza toh tab hai jab in gaharion ko baki log bhee samjhe... and I am sure if young people like you and I( mai bhee yar ibhee itna bada nee hoon:cool: ) learn these details and teach others it will benefit the society and nobody can raise a finger on Shree Ram.
 
Ab Chali Thread...

Dear All,

Some of us are saying things so authoritatively as though RAM & RAVAN were our school time buddies who played marbles with us. Ye sab Kahani Kisse hain, mere hisab se. Everyone has his/her opinion and so do I.

It is the matter of FAITH. Let me give an example. Take a lump of '****' or 'Gobar' or 'Whatever'. Start worshipping it as GOD and have total FAITH in your new GOD. Assign all powers of the world to your GOD and start following few basic principles of 'humanity'. Then see the difference your new GOD makes in your life. Ye mat bolna, "Shitpot, meri Naukri luuwa de mein 100 rupay ka prasad chadha doonga". Maano to Ganga Maa hai, na mano to bahta pani...

Ye RAM, RAVAN sab kahani kisse hain jo ki purane logoon nein insann ko ek bhala rastaa dikhane ke liye kahanion ke taur par likkhay thay. Samay beet ta gaya or vo ban ge 'Granth'.

Every story has a lesson hidden inside for the worthy to understand and take advantage. Saare saal tax chori kar ke ar apnon ko dukh pahuncha kar 'Jai Mata Di' karna beimaani hai.

I agree that Ramayana & Mahabharata are great stories and do drive home some good lessons as far as Inter & Intra Personal relations are concerned. It is upto the individual as to what he can derive out of them: Amrit ya Zahar and become a RAM or RAVAN.

Regards,

JS Malik
 
Laage Raho !!!

Bhai Laage Raho!

Hum bhi maanan laag rahe sein...Kati thaam sab ke saath saan bhai....humne bera se bhaiyaan ki baat to man-ni e padegi.....

!! Laage Raho Gagan Bhai ka yoh thread 500 post paar karna chahiye...

Gagan bhai tain Limca book mein jagah diwani sei....

Arey kit khu gye Gagan bhai....Kime Sambhaal lo thread ne.....:D Laage sei bhai kite mandir mein gaya....hude te laptop pe Jatland te connnect karega...Shudhh vichaar kar ke Jatland pe likhega ...

Bhai re majaak mein likhya sei kade saare Taate (Garam) ho jao mere pe......:D
 
anilsangwan said:
Bhai Laage Raho!

Hum bhi maanan laag rahe sein...Kati thaam sab ke saath saan bhai....humne bera se bhaiyaan ki baat to man-ni e padegi.....

!! Laage Raho Gagan Bhai ka yoh thread 500 post paar karna chahiye...

Gagan bhai tain Limca book mein jagah diwani sei....

Arey kit khu gye Gagan bhai....Kime Sambhaal lo thread ne.....:D Laage sei bhai kite mandir mein gaya....hude te laptop pe Jatland te connnect karega...Shudhh vichaar kar ke Jatland pe likhega ...

Bhai re majaak mein likhya sei kade saare Taate (Garam) ho jao mere pe......:D



Tatte.....................Ha...ha...ha...ha. Kasuut kaam hogya Anil......ho...ho...ho. Bang on regardless !
 
Truth...

arunshamli said:
now coming back to the topic, Ram was the only one in Ramayan who was not captured or even touched by Ravan or his army. Lakshman was almost killed by Meghnad, sugreev you alread have written was hiding in jungle(Bali ke dar ke mare)....

Ram was kidnapped alongwith Lakshman by Ahiravan who was another brother of Ravan from so called pataal :) then Hanuman brought both of them back.

About Hanuman....But it is wrong to say ki Ram kuch nahi thaa...sab kuch Hanuman ne kiya...Meghnad usko arrest karke Ravan ke darbar me le gaya thaa....Ravna ne uski khub insult kee thee....aur uska saare city me julus nikala thaa....but he managed to escape, and before leaving he did some damage to the Lanka city also.

Hanuman had special powers that no shashtra could harm him. Meghnaad used Brahmastra which Hanuman respected and himself got entangled into it. Ravan didnt insult him..rather Hanuman made mockery of his power..He was a naughty monkey god :)
 
truth

rkumar said:
One might give credit to Hanuman and others for many missions, but truth is otherwise. If Hanuman was so capable without Lord Rama, how come he could not help his best friend Sugreev ? Why that Hanuman and Sugreev had to live in hiding in Kiskindha mountain range? If Hanuman was such a capable person that he could retieve the wives of others, why he could not get the wife of Sugreev relieved from Bali?.
Rajendra

Due to a shrap in his bachpan, Hanuman had forgotten all his powers..probably thats why he didnt really help Sugreev :) He got his powers back when Jambvant(king of the bhalus) reminded him of same..

Regarding fighting with Bali, let all be known that Bali had a vardaan that if anybody fought with him(while facing him directly), Bali would get half the power of other person so no body could defeat him per say in legitimate way. This is the reason, Ram also killed him from behind and never came in front of him..
 
Other side of coin..

Well I dont suppose Ram was a god. If he was really god, he wouldn't have needed all help from Vanar sena. If we believe that Gods are the supreme power, then they can do anything. They help us and not the other way round.

Ram was possibly just another Great King whose stories turned into holy scriptures(Ramayana) over the period of time. Secondly the so called stories of Gods taking birth on earth in human form when Paap rises, seem a fools thought.

Agar aisa hi hai to apne so called kalyuga mein, bahut paap ho rahe hain roj. There are much more cruel persons than Ravana all over the world. Where is God now? Aur so called satyuga mein bhi sab burai hoti thi..

And all the concepts of Vimana, brahmastra n various kind of weapons are all very similar to modern day fighter jets, nuclear bombs, etc. Ramayana mein aam janta ke liye unhi ki terms mein inke baare mein likha gaya..Planes ko udte hue rath bana diya..nuclear bomb ko brahmastra bana diya.

But still, I enjoy Ramayana path a lot..the way ramayana is read is thrilling..ram ke bhajan, shlok padhne mein, sunane mein bahut achhe lagte hain..So as far as u enjoy reading such stuff, enjoy the bhajans..do good in life..you automatically enjoy Godliness :)
 
pnauhwar21 said:
Ram was kidnapped alongwith Lakshman by Ahiravan who was another brother of Ravan from so called pataal :) then Hanuman brought both of them back.
Hanuman had special powers that no shashtra could harm him. Meghnaad used Brahmastra which Hanuman respected and himself got entangled into it. Ravan didnt insult him..rather Hanuman made mockery of his power..He was a naughty monkey god :)
good point....could you please give the reference in Ramayan in which chapter (shaloka ) Ahiravan kidnapped Ram and Lakshman and I will research it further.


Yes, Ravan insulted Hanuman and usme aag laga kar saare city me ghumaya thaa....you do not burn somebody if you respect them. Ravan did not respect anybody. not even his own brothers and relatives.


So you think Hanuman was a monkey and he was a God. but this conflicts with your next post where you are saying Ram was not God. Are you saying Hanuman was God?

The way I interpret it is that Hanuman was not a monkey and he was not God also. He was a human being with lot of wisdom and skills. He belonged to a sect of people called VANAR.

yes, Ram killed bali from the hiding ...but why did not Sugreev and Hanuman did it?

I tend to agree with you that Ram was not God and he was a human being with extra abilities. He had all human qualities..he was born to human parents and he died when he grew old. he had wife and kids....and he had all the emotions which all human being do have...hunger , happiness, anger, pain, sorrow and many more...

where as God do not have these qualities. refer to the yajurveda mantra(40/8)
this mantra clearly says that God is formless and free from all pain and misery. he is by himself(swayambhu).... he does not grow old...uska janam and mrityu nahi hote...he is forever....he does not need any assistance from anyone...and he is the only father of the world...and that he only should be worshiped.

Ram had none of these qualities...and in my view he was not God.

Why he is called God:- most of the people just believe what they are told. and they do not even want to think about it. for them Ram is God and if anyone say otherwise, it hurts thier feelings. coming back to why Ram is called God. Patanjal yog Darsahn says that when you do yog-sadhna( yam[satya, ahinsa, asteya, brahamcharya, a-parigraha] , niyam[soch, santosh, tap, swa-dhaya,ishwar parnidhan], aasan, pranayam, prityahar, Dharna , dhayan , samadhi) you realize the God in your body in the samadhi state. aajkal log jisko yoga bolte hain that is not yoga...that is only aasan(excercise) by due to lack of knowledge they call it yoga. So in samadhi stage when you realize God, he further says that you get some divya powers. and you become equivallent to God but he does not say you become God. Rishis vyas in vedant darshan says such person get all the pwoer excepts the power of creation of the universe. So a yogi is euivalent to god but not god. it is like saying...kai bar society me bhee dekhneme milta hai ki when you respect some one...you say he is like my fahter...but he is not your father...same is the case of a yogi. they are like God but they can never be God. Ramayan me bahoot jagha likha hai ki Ram was a yogi and he used to study vedas. So it is okay to use the word bahgwan for Ram to give him extra respect. but we must remember that it does not make him God. Same is the case of Shri Krishan. he is known as yogeshwer in Gita.

Ram he was a great person....and a lot of things can be learned from his charachter....he was maryada prurushotam.(purushon me uttam).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top