Jat Martyrs – Neglected by Historians
- Thread starter dndeswal
- Start date
[/QUOTE]
FOR THE SAKE OF HISTORICAL ACCURACY
Balram singh did not die at Delhi or Farrukhnagar nor in the battle.he was assasinated in cold blood through conspiracy of Jawahar singh , because after death of surajmal Balram opposed the jawahar singh and installed his younger brother as king of bharatpur,after capturing throne jawahar got him murdered through hired killers. Balram was most powerful commander and majority of jat sena was serving under him so he was a real threat for jawahar singh . Jawahars younger brother took shelter at darbar of Jaipur and died in the Jaipur
yes, i visited jats in rajasthan, some of them really never knew that in another district of rajasthan jats are there, where they r distributed globally, more than n e other caste
FOR THE SAKE OF HISTORICAL ACCURACY
Balram singh did not die at Delhi or Farrukhnagar nor in the battle.he was assasinated in cold blood through conspiracy of Jawahar singh , because after death of surajmal Balram opposed the jawahar singh and installed his younger brother as king of bharatpur,after capturing throne jawahar got him murdered through hired killers. Balram was most powerful commander and majority of jat sena was serving under him so he was a real threat for jawahar singh . Jawahars younger brother took shelter at darbar of Jaipur and died in the Jaipur[/quote]
u better write of historical accuracy of rana pratap...his chetak.. etc. he could not cross even a little drain...better write about mahmood ghazni... when he looted somnath....no rajput but jat in sindh ... looted him back..
Balram singh did not die at Delhi or Farrukhnagar nor in the battle.he was assasinated in cold blood through conspiracy of Jawahar singh , because after death of surajmal Balram opposed the jawahar singh and installed his younger brother as king of bharatpur,after capturing throne jawahar got him murdered through hired killers. Balram was most powerful commander and majority of jat sena was serving under him so he was a real threat for jawahar singh . Jawahars younger brother took shelter at darbar of Jaipur and died in the Jaipur[/quote]
u better write of historical accuracy of rana pratap...his chetak.. etc. he could not cross even a little drain...better write about mahmood ghazni... when he looted somnath....no rajput but jat in sindh ... looted him back..
he died in 1942, n then just 5 saal me 1947 ho gaya. ek bheeshm ke dil ka bantwara ho gaya, hastinapur divide ho gaya...jat divide ho gaya...
FOR THE SAKE OF HISTORICAL ACCURACY
Balram singh did not die at Delhi or Farrukhnagar nor in the battle.he was assasinated in cold blood through conspiracy of Jawahar singh , because after death of surajmal Balram opposed the jawahar singh and installed his younger brother as king of bharatpur,after capturing throne jawahar got him murdered through hired killers. Balram was most powerful commander and majority of jat sena was serving under him so he was a real threat for jawahar singh . Jawahars younger brother took shelter at darbar of Jaipur and died in the Jaipur[/QUOTE]
Aap ka haath english me kuchh tung lagta sahb ji. the is never used b4 n e name. the jawahar singh is highly undesirable here. where here what deswalji writes in hindi font, must not be mis understood that he does not know n e english font.
guptas were the only dynasty in world history, deswalji, who used samskrit as the court language. the golden period in history, as believed was by guptas. they started gupta era. b4 that was saka/hun era. b4 that was vikram era. n latest was harsha era
in fact they all were good eras. because all by jats
in fact they all were good eras. because all by jats
You have written multiple posts, Antriksh - maybe in a hurry. I have never used the term "the Jawahar Singh". I notice that it was first written in post No. 22 (by Singhran Chowhan) and then again "quoted" in your two posts.
.
one kujla kadfices entered india from central asia. he was XWN (kushan, saka, hun). centred at muttra (mathura), guptas were then following the dresses of army of this kushan/jat emperor. all their names of successors (of kushans) were after the hindu gods like vasudev etc. they had forgotten their foreign identity.
dresses of gupta n kushana army were same. loose trousers n long boots. being both from muttra, maharaja kanishka ka boot milta hai mathura (museum) me sir nahin milta nahar ki tarah. hamare sub jo virja, daya, krishna bhi to shayad muttra ki badolat hi jiye. DR. K p jaiswal described guptas as jats from punjab. yes i agree that it was all punjab only that cultivated the land initially n rama krishna were born out of that land cultivation
deswalji, jo achha lage usse apna lo, jo bura lage ussse jane do....
jat vo jo apne paaon pe kulhadi maare, jat vo jo apne hi desh me sub se lute. jat kaalidas hai. jat navratan hai chandragupt ka. but i felt jeolous of u, because jo jat ke bare me ye nahin janta ki hun, saka, kushan, aryan, turk, mann, goth, jutes, jutts, etc. all are same. n e world dictionary maintains that jat n aryan were same. no dictionary in world denies that aryan/jat were barbarians. but u r doing good service to jats. i shall make u sit with my father. he will explain all history to u.