Learn from Israel !!!!!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
I suppose same should apply to Israel also. What Israel is doing should be for Israelis to judge and not the self appointed class room brigade. Why all these arguments and counter arguments here.

RK^2

How do I differ.... I posted a number of links giving the evidence that how Israelis are turning up in thousands against this massive murderous assault.
 
You seem to be a justice loving person, whose religion is humanity. Well what is your justice on it :

We Indians worked hard a lot and gathered tons of gold in our temples. We were richest country in the world known as 'sone ki chidiya'. Then some Muslims wolves invaded our land and not only looted our gold, but enslaved us for centuries, butchered us, raped our women, forced us to convert and did all the tyrannies they could do. Well then European wolves came and enslaved us for next many centuries. What was our fault? Where were apostles of justice like you then? We somehow got partial freedom. Now we have no danger, it is not so. We have not only Pakistani, Chinese and Bangladeshi wolves around, but a particular community within our country too which is busy in love jehad, conversion and alike practices to eliminate us. Your religion is humanity, so you don't care if in coming time you are forced to convert to a particular religion, but many people will not accept it. It will hurt self respect. So what is your justice?
And take it as an advice. A particular community will take you as a Hindu as you have Hindu name and in many riot hit areas they shot dead many people after they knew their Hindu names. So have such a name, which belongs to no particular religion, if you really are just a human.

It only begs a smile!

Human history told with such frugality as some National Geographic channel showing the life of predators (wolves) and the prey ( supposedly us).

I must tell you religion during the age of empires and religion during the present era of nations/states have different connotations. But, religions have never been ascribed for human misery, just see aren't women getting raped today, aren't the old and children getting butchered while sleeping in their homes, aren't material possession getting looted today. So, where is the religious angle to all this. It is the elite's desire for power which uses religion as an instrument for its goals. After all, even conversion did not guarantee the dignity of human life. Had it been so, then there would not have been acute backwardness in Muslim population of South Asia.

And, the tyranny of the marauders during war time must be differentiated from the state policy during peaceful times. Muslims rulers nowhere preached violence against the subjects as a state policy. In fact, if you go by history then all those atrocities you have mentioned have been more on the western side of our present border extending upto Iraq. Muslim population have suffered more at the hands of Muslim rulers in the West Asia. Many Mughals gave money for repairs of Hindu temples too, eg. the one in Mathura, Krishna temple... So, we can leave this polarised view for now.

And, so far as rise and fall of nations is concerned. Yes, human history is replete with wars that happened in South Asia long before the advent of Muslims, how to deny those?
 
Last edited:
मोदी जी ! पाकिस्तान को काश्मीर सीमा पर कैसे पटखनी देनी है, इसके लिए आपको इजराइल से हाथ मिलाना पड़ेगा। इजराइल के पास ऐसे-ऐसे आधुनिक हथियार हैं कि पाकिस्तान कैसे दुम दबाकर भागता है एवँ इधर कभी मुड़कर भी नहीं देखेगा।
 
So, one of final truths emerging out...Israel and US both are not the members of International Criminal Court that stands for investigation into war crimes. Obviously, they know their acts would be brought to justice. Interestingly, HAMAS has supported the Palestine Authority bid to sign for the membership of ICC that would allow international war crimes tribunal to visit Gaza and make a case for the parties on both the sides. But, HAMAS acceding to it is a good move.

more on this here....http://indianexpress.com/article/wo...chief-backs-international-criminal-court-bid/
 
So, one of final truths emerging out...Israel and US both are not the members of International Criminal Court that stands for investigation into war crimes. Obviously, they know their acts would be brought to justice. Interestingly, HAMAS has supported the Palestine Authority bid to sign for the membership of ICC that would allow international war crimes tribunal to visit Gaza and make a case for the parties on both the sides. But, HAMAS acceding to it is a good move.

more on this here....http://indianexpress.com/article/wo...chief-backs-international-criminal-court-bid/

You claim to be objective and not taking sides. Why don't you educate members as to why Israel has not joined the membership of ICC. What are reasons Israel is giving ? Do you know that terrorism is not a crime in ICC charter ?

RK^2
 
Last edited:
You claim to be objective and not taking sides. Why don't you educate members as to why Israel has not joined the membership of ICC. What are reasons Israel is giving ? Do you know that terrorism is not a crime in ICC charter ?

RK^2

I don't know what you mean by stating that terrorism is not crime in ICC charter. Are you suggesting Israel is free to perpetrate as much terror it wishes.

Israel did not join not because terrorism is not part of Rome statute but because of the following articles, which make Israel guilty of war-crimes.



Article 5 1 Crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court: The jurisdiction of the Court shall be limited to the most serious crimes of concern to the international community as a whole. The Court has jurisdiction in accordance with this Statute with respect to the following crimes:

(a) The crime of genocide;
(b) Crimes against humanity;
(c) War crimes;
(d) The crime of aggression.
.
.
Article 6 Genocide: For the purpose of this Statute, "genocide" means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring
about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
.
.
Article 8 2 War crimes:.
.
2. For the purpose of this Statute, "war crimes" means:
(a) Grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, namely, any of the following acts against persons or property protected under the provisions of the relevant Geneva Convention:

(i) Wilful killing;
(ii) Torture or inhuman treatment, including biological experiments;
(iii) Wilfully causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or health;
(iv) Extensive destruction and appropriation of property, not justified by military necessity and carried out unlawfully and wantonly;
(v) Compelling a prisoner of war or other protected person to serve in the forces of a hostile Power;
(vi) Wilfully depriving a prisoner of war or other protected person of the rights of fair and regular trial;
(vii) Unlawful deportation or transfer or unlawful confinement;
(viii) Taking of hostages.

.
.
.
(ii) Intentionally directing attacks against civilian objects, that is, objects which are not military objectives;

(ix) Intentionally directing attacks against buildings dedicated to religion, education, art, science or charitable purposes, historic monuments,
hospitals and places where the sick and wounded are collected, provided they are not military objectives;
.
.
Article 8 bis 3 Crime of aggression

1. For the purpose of this Statute, “crime of aggression” means the planning, preparation, initiation or execution, by a person in a position effectively to exercise control over or to direct the political or military action of a State, of an act of aggression which, by its character, gravity and scale, constitutes a manifest violation of the Charter of the United Nations.

(a) The invasion or attack by the armed forces of a State of the territory of another State, or any military occupation, however temporary, resulting from such invasion or attack, or any annexation by the use of force of the territory of another State or part thereof;

(xxiv) Intentionally directing attacks against buildings, material, medical units and transport, and personnel using the distinctive emblems of
the Geneva Conventions in conformity with international law; (xxv) Intentionally using starvation of civilians as a method of warfare by
depriving them of objects indispensable to their survival, including wilfully impeding relief supplies as provided for under the Geneva
Conventions;


What else could be exhaustive definition of terrorism. This is the reason why Israel is not a party, not to deny the acts of HAMAS, but they have agreed to it.


Also,
Testimony of Netherlands: Rome Statute had jurisdiction over the most serious crimes of international concern; the crime of terrorism was encompassed in such crimes and had been thus included in resolution E of the Final Act of the Rome Conference.

Source:ICC-ASP/8/20 50 Annex II Report of the Working Group on the Review Conference A. Introduction 1. The Working Group on the Review Conference was established by the Assembly at the …www.icc-cpi.int/iccdocs/asp_docs/RC2010/WGRC-ENG.pdf
 
Last edited:
I don't know what you mean by stating that terrorism is not crime in ICC charter. Are you suggesting Israel is free to perpetrate as much terror it wishes.

Israel did not join not because terrorism is not part of Rome statute but because of the following articles, which make Israel guilty of war-crimes.






What else could be exhaustive definition of terrorism. This is the reason why Israel is not a party, not to deny the acts of HAMAS, but they have agreed to it.


Also,

That is your interpretation and not necessarily of a sizable population having the contrary view. If Hamas thinks Israel is committing war crimes, why don't they go to ICC ? Every country has reasons of not signing international treaties. India also has not signed NPT as she thinks its discriminatory. Israel must be having similar views. Who are you and me to decide what their interests are. It has become a fashion to give unsolicited lectures to Israel. Anyway...this is an unending debate, more so when have consolidated our respective opinions.

RK^2
 
That is your interpretation ...RK^2

If one thing that I am not doing here is the interpretation. I produce evidences to prove what I have to say...I don't pronounce judgements I produce facts as hard as diamonds to put the case.

On the contrary, see what you do....
a sizable population having the contrary view
Do you have any statistic to support this?

Who are you and me to decide what their interests are.
Don't club me with you here Sir. I have my credentials.
 
Last edited:
This is not to say that International Crime Court is some holy institution that can help restore some justice to the Palestinians. In fact the following article will expose how unjust the trial of Yugoslave President Milosevic was and by the same standards Israeli PM Sharon got unscathed.

http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2002/05/isra-m02.html

Every judgment ever given in any court of law in whole human history left one side dissatisfied and this is why people go to higher and higher courts. There is no verdict ever given which is acceptable to all.

RK^2
 
If one thing that I am not doing here is the interpretation. I produce evidences to prove what I have to say...I don't pronounce judgements I produce facts as hard as diamonds to put the case.

Your evidence does not necessarily mean other side's evidence. Evidence is always subjective.

RK^2
 
If one thing that I am not doing here is the interpretation. I produce evidences to prove what I have to say...I don't pronounce judgements I produce facts as hard as diamonds to put the case.

On the contrary, see what you do.... Do you have any statistic to support this?

Don't club me with you here Sir. I have my credentials.
Here you go... raising the umbrella of your credentials.. May I request if you have a degree in international law or what that I should accept your credentials on the subject? Sorry if it hurts.. I don't claim any such competence by the way.. I am just behaving like a common man who is often invited as jury in the courts in many countries.

RK^2
 
Here you go... raising the umbrella of your credentials.. May I request if you have a degree in international law or what that I should accept your credentials on the subject? Sorry if it hurts.. I don't claim any such competence by the way.. I am just behaving like a common man who is often invited as jury in the courts in many countries.

RK^2

Hahah.... I would prefer to respect the fact that you are a senior citizen....I am just a 'teacher'.
 
Last edited:
Hahah.... I would prefer to respect the fact that you are a senior citizen....I just a 'teacher'.

To be honest with you, I am a great follower of Bhism Pita Mah. Vaad vivad aur yudh me age ki koi importance nahi hoti. On a lighter note can I ask you if you are a communist or teaching in an institution dominated by communist ideology ? I somehow think so.

RK^2
 
मोदी जी ! पाकिस्तान को काश्मीर सीमा पर कैसे पटखनी देनी है, इसके लिए आपको इजराइल से हाथ मिलाना पड़ेगा। इजराइल के पास ऐसे-ऐसे आधुनिक हथियार हैं कि पाकिस्तान कैसे दुम दबाकर भागता है एवँ इधर कभी मुड़कर भी नहीं देखेगा।[/QUOTE
kaun se hai jara hame bhi gyan digiyega.we all wants to get rid of pakk and nebourig countries:)
 
India and Indians historically has sympathy towards the Palestine. However in recent years Indians never got any support from Arab world and India had no option but to develop relation Israel. India cannot openly go against either of them because Arab will never support India against Pakistan however India need them to be at least neutral in some disputes.

India cannot even openly support Israel because it fears that might jeopardise its relation with Iran with whom it always had good relations and it can check on Pak western border from there as well.

In any case historically it is a problem created by Western World. They created boundaries in Asia and Africa based on lakes, rivers and mountains whereas nations are based on common culture, language or a common goal.
 
Last edited:
To be honest with you, I am a great follower of Bhism Pita Mah. Vaad vivad aur yudh me age ki koi importance nahi hoti. On a lighter note can I ask you if you are a communist or teaching in an institution dominated by communist ideology ? I somehow think so.

RK^2

सर जी आयु कि महत्ता होती है ..... एक तो हथियार ढंग से नहीं उठता है दूसरे जुबान भी लड़खड़ा जाती है ।

Who am I...hmmmm.....it would take time to explore......

I think....I also mentioned earlier also...and even now....communism is one of the strong ideological cornerstones of Jewish history.....even Karl Marx, and USSR Permier Primakov were Jew. And, Many Soviet Jews took prominent position in Israeli cabinet. Libermann, a Moldovian (Moldova was part of USSR) Jew was Foreign Minister of Israel.

So, I am a petty small thing before those tall orders of communism ordained by Jews.....LoL
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top