I think what Jinnah did was a sane decision....if we wouldn't have opted for partition then today we would have been suffering like Iran,Iraq,Afganistan etc....Today what's happening in Pakistan would have happend in India....Muslims who seek Jihad would have never stayed peacefully here....what they do once in year(e.g terror in Bombay) they would have done everyday in our country....and little we could do when citizens living within our country would have done it...Hindus would have lived a miserable life....We curse him because of riots as a consequence of the partition which forced lot of people leave their homes and lost everything....but i am sure if that wudn't have happened at that point of time it would have happened till now with more nasty results in comparison...i am sure you wouldn't have wished for riots everyday....May be Jinnah had some vision behind doing that....So if Advani praised Jinnah its not such a big deal,so lets not blow out of proportion....Coin always have two sides
Now coming back to the topic....Mayawati is a really really sad choice in any case.I have already expressed my views and if i dont reply now on then please dont think that i have fallen short of answers
i dont want to discuss this controversial discussion....it was indeed a good discussion,enjoyed it very much 
Regards
Now coming back to the topic....Mayawati is a really really sad choice in any case.I have already expressed my views and if i dont reply now on then please dont think that i have fallen short of answers
Regards
There is something between praising and abusing. ...Just to keep quite and not to mention that name.. Mr Advani could have just kept quite on Jinnah..
RK^2
Last edited: