I knew that people can go so down and indulge into any kind of absurd mockeries, but this shallowness is sick and cheap ! I played some games then let me know them and the people with whom I played ! Let me also know what I have done because you have crossed all limits of jeaolousy and God knows why ! I have no clue, just tell me what u mean by this precisely !
sex identification
- Thread starter ssindhu
- Start date
- Status
I knew that people can go so down and indulge into any kind of absurd mockeries, but this shallowness is sick and cheap ! I played some games then let me know them and the people with whom I played ! Let me also know what I have done because you have crossed all limits of jeaolousy and God knows why ! I have no clue, just tell me what u mean by this precisely !
see dahling how kiddie you are...you should choose words with bit care...stop thinking of youself in such role-model stature...
and now i don't want any mud slinging here...
You cant do even if you want because how far can one go substantiating all kind of baseless lies !
lolz
"The only difference between the saint and the sinner is that every saint has a past, and every sinner has a future." - Sanjeev Nandal
"In the end, everything is a gag." - Sanjeev Nandal
I'm lovin it ! - McDonalds
"The only difference between the saint and the sinner is that every saint has a past, and every sinner has a future." - Sanjeev Nandal
"In the end, everything is a gag." - Sanjeev Nandal
I'm lovin it ! - McDonalds
lolz
"The only difference between the saint and the sinner is that every saint has a past, and every sinner has a future." - Sanjeev Nandal
"In the end, everything is a gag." - Sanjeev Nandal
I'm lovin it ! - McDonalds
__________________
Sanjeev Nandal,
CSC, US of A.
"Ruthless aggression - My only weapon"
I'm loving it too
badhiya dost ... sahi jagah par sahi post
A
anilsinghd
Guest
I really admire that there are still some nuetral people left who would rather concentrate on discussions than "enjoying" their so-called fun !
Let me start my actual post with again an reiteration that i am up to prevent the sactity of discussion and it is very important to keep the spirit good else there is hardly any need to discuss !
As one thing gets clear that there were some personal reasons behind some of the mud-slinging , i dont wish to delve into that matter , none of my busniness and concerns.
I just wish to ask Seema Ji , and people who wish to consider the existance of discussion , a few questions :
( Randomly written as they come to my mind , not associated with any priorities ) !
1. When i asked something in a very constructive approach , Seema ji chose not to comment on that but on my "hardtyped" signatures and my " kidult " psychology. Was it really required ?
2. Being deliberately rude to someone for personal reasons on an social platform is not the way to go ! Or is it ?
( what about the other audience who comes for the sake of some healthy discussion ? )
3. As Amit Sir poiinted out , discussion should be to listen and try and understand , investigate the difference , constuctively try to bridge the differences , or to have constructive differences of opinion.
But in this thread , i no where find any of that element.
If i look closely at the very first post , and i would request all to do the same ,
it is like :
fact ( quote of some text) ....opinion ..... point ......opinion .... reason......
( and punctuated by bullshit ( the referred article ) , is stupid ( the different view ), bloody ( NGOs ) )
And the situation got worse when :
*** to hell with society...first leran to think of individual freedom and well being...then society...
*** why don't people understand that nothing like society exists...if you believe, it's there, else it's not...
*** one grave problem with bloody ignorant indians is that they don't wish to exist as individuals...leran to worship your individuality and your prerogatives...and we will be a properous country
Again a bang bang bang opinion and the conclusion !
It is not hard to conclude that neither the author has thought enough on the topic , nor is she willing to listen any other thing than what she believes. Moreover , she is not at all in a situation where she has enough time to gather what she has in her mind.
( I know people have different styles of writing and organising skills but the above conclusions are obvious on a little examination ).
Here i am left with only one question : If you dont want a discussion , if you dont wish to listen to others , if you dont have time enough for the issue ! Why bother about it ?
Just dont write !!!
Its like robbing people of their time and energy !
As suggested by the author , be an individualist , hell the society , stop discussing when you really dont want to !I apologise to Seema ji and all for being sarcastic in my very post, but the intentions were noble , i was upset about the fact that sensitive issues are put to the floor with no sense of responsibility and no regard for the discussion , thus degrading the very sanctity of such an platform.
Regards,
Anil
I really admire that there are still some nuetral people left who would rather concentrate on discussions than "enjoying" their so-called fun !
Let me start my actual post with again an reiteration that i am up to prevent the sactity of discussion and it is very important to keep the spirit good else there is hardly any need to discuss !
As one thing gets clear that there were some personal reasons behind some of the mud-slinging , i dont wish to delve into that matter , none of my busniness and concerns.
I just wish to ask Seema Ji , and people who wish to consider the existance of discussion , a few questions :
( Randomly written as they come to my mind , not associated with any priorities ) !
1. When i asked something in a very constructive approach , Seema ji chose not to comment on that but on my "hardtyped" signatures and my " kidult " psychology. Was it really required ?
2. Being deliberately rude to someone for personal reasons on an social platform is not the way to go ! Or is it ?
( what about the other audience who comes for the sake of some healthy discussion ? )
3. As Amit Sir poiinted out , discussion should be to listen and try and understand , investigate the difference , constuctively try to bridge the differences , or to have constructive differences of opinion.
But in this thread , i no where find any of that element.
If i look closely at the very first post , and i would request all to do the same ,
it is like :
fact ( quote of some text) ....opinion ..... point ......opinion .... reason......
( and punctuated by bullshit ( the referred article ) , is stupid ( the different view ), bloody ( NGOs ) )
And the situation got worse when :
*** to hell with society...first leran to think of individual freedom and well being...then society...
*** why don't people understand that nothing like society exists...if you believe, it's there, else it's not...
*** one grave problem with bloody ignorant indians is that they don't wish to exist as individuals...leran to worship your individuality and your prerogatives...and we will be a properous country
Again a bang bang bang opinion and the conclusion !
It is not hard to conclude that neither the author has thought enough on the topic , nor is she willing to listen any other thing than what she believes. Moreover , she is not at all in a situation where she has enough time to gather what she has in her mind.
( I know people have different styles of writing and organising skills but the above conclusions are obvious on a little examination ).
Here i am left with only one question : If you dont want a discussion , if you dont wish to listen to others , if you dont have time enough for the issue ! Why bother about it ?
Just dont write !!!
Its like robbing people of their time and energy !
I apologise to Seema ji and all for being sarcastic in my very post, but the intentions were noble , i was upset about the fact that sensitive issues are put to the floor with no sense of responsibility and no regard for the discussion , thus degrading the very sanctity of such an platform.
Regards,
Anil
well that nit picking comment and kidult call was for you pointing so some typos
and as far as the solution to this concerns, i think, is lift the ban on sex determining test...it should be people's own prerogative and no 3rd party's decision
as far as my crude remarks on shweta 'ji' were concerned...there was nothing personal, i really found them stupid as much as the govt and NGOs fight for wrong cause...
now i admit that i really don't have more time to discuss this further...as most of the posts were banal...and same against which i wrote this...
and people who think on these lines have a problem for every solution as one can make out from reading...
all are going back to square one--ban on sex determination--
so what else is left for me to discuss...
shailendra
New member
Well, especially when it's women who perpetrate it!
...I found it interesting that among some of the examples given the most prominent and telling ones were where it's the 'Saas' themselves ('Saas' of the Saas-bahu kinds, not the 'saas' that Ajit of 'loin' fame
used to ask his henchmen "Robbart, mughe Maggi ka 'saas' chaiyeh!")
I mean the fact that it's none other than the women, the mother-in-laws of the world themselves mentioned foremost as the ones putting the actual initial peer 'pressure' on the 'Bahu' (another woman)... What does that say about the whole issue, I ask ya!!?!!
Hopefully, in that context maybe the discussion can be seen also in a slightly alternative and different light...
ps. ...and oh, If for any reason there is something that was not agreeable in there; please, please... oh please don't throw the book at me, Seema!!! Mein bada ruk-ruk kae, darr-darr kae es thread pae aaya hun, Mausiji!
[Heh! Heh! Just kidding there!... ]
...I found it interesting that among some of the examples given the most prominent and telling ones were where it's the 'Saas' themselves ('Saas' of the Saas-bahu kinds, not the 'saas' that Ajit of 'loin' fame
used to ask his henchmen "Robbart, mughe Maggi ka 'saas' chaiyeh!") I mean the fact that it's none other than the women, the mother-in-laws of the world themselves mentioned foremost as the ones putting the actual initial peer 'pressure' on the 'Bahu' (another woman)... What does that say about the whole issue, I ask ya!!?!!
Hopefully, in that context maybe the discussion can be seen also in a slightly alternative and different light...
ps. ...and oh, If for any reason there is something that was not agreeable in there; please, please... oh please don't throw the book at me, Seema!!! Mein bada ruk-ruk kae, darr-darr kae es thread pae aaya hun, Mausiji!
[Heh! Heh! Just kidding there!... ]...I found it interesting that among some of the examples given the most prominent and telling ones were where it's the 'Saas' themselves ('Saas' of the Saas-bahu kinds, not the 'saas' that Ajit of 'loin' fame
I mean the fact that it's none other than the women, the mother-in-laws of the world themselves mentioned foremost as the ones putting the actual initial peer 'pressure' on the 'Bahu' (another woman)... What does that say about the whole issue, I ask ya!!?!!
Hopefully, in that context maybe the discussion can be seen also in a slightly alternative and different light...
ps. ...and oh, If for any reason there is something that was not agreeable in there; please, please... oh please don't throw the book at me, Seema!!! Mein bada ruk-ruk kae, darr-darr kae es thread pae aaya hun, Mausiji!
are o sambha, pahad ki choti se per (legs) latkaye latkaye tohaar per bahut lambe lagne lage hai hume...kaaliya tanik aari to leke...kaat de sasurwa ka per...bahut adne lage hai...ha ha ha
shailendra
New member
Kaalia, ["Hazoor, meine aapka namak khaaya hai...thoda shakkar bhi dilwaey diyo sarkaar???"...] "Aji per yae Sambha koi bakri ka bachcha to hai nahee kae daude aur pakad liya, jaane yeh Gaon-waale esae konsee chakki ka aanta khilaate hein; dekh liyo ekdum gabroo 'superman' jaisa ho gya hai re yeh susraa!!!
Gabbar (aka Seema) to Kaalia,"Suaar ka bachcha!!! aaak-Thooo!...Es sae to pchaas-kos door baithe tere maa-baap nae 'sex-identification' theek sae karvya liya hota to aaj mera naam mitti mein na milaye deta!"
A
anilsinghd
Guest
...I found it interesting that among some of the examples given the most prominent and telling ones were where it's the 'Saas' themselves ('Saas' of the Saas-bahu kinds, not the 'saas' that Ajit of 'loin' fame
I mean the fact that it's none other than the women, the mother-in-laws of the world themselves mentioned foremost as the ones putting the actual initial peer 'pressure' on the 'Bahu' (another woman)... What does that say about the whole issue, I ask ya!!?!!
Hopefully, in that context maybe the discussion can be seen also in a slightly alternative and different light...
ps. ...and oh, If for any reason there is something that was not agreeable in there; please, please... oh please don't throw the book at me, Seema!!! Mein bada ruk-ruk kae, darr-darr kae es thread pae aaya hun, Mausiji!
Yup , one of the very valid points !!! I have examples of both the extremes personally in my house , my "taai" on one hand is so biased towards only having boys ( pote ) , while my mom is absolutely neutral towards it , perhaps a lil biased towards the girls ( poti ) !!
PS : this fact should not be used to prove anything regarding me ... ( the arguments like meri maa mujhse itna frustaa chuki hai isliye ....
)to kaaliya , sambhaa , gabbar are rquested to move ahead with the discussion agar pair kat chuke hon to !!!
- Status