Should we change jatland.com to hinduland.com?

Status
Not open for further replies.
NOT ONE BUT SO MANY RESEARCH SCHOLARS SAY THAT DIFFERENT GROUPS ARE RELATED TO ONE STOCK .

We said so many times they migrated earlier out of India.Science has hard proof for that.
 
egypt conquest of jats

vinodji, it was in 2600 bc perhaps n not in 600 bc. amorites (mor jats now in sonepat/later mauryas of asokas fame) who came from the land of djati, attacked it.
 
not hengi its henga jats around muttra

the heng-giri and bal-giri (bal jats of punjab and balyan jats of UP of sisauli, of tikaits fame), these two jat clans were in fact attacking the roman empire. they are believed to have founded hungary and balgaria.

henga jats are like sinsinwars, bhagoria, chahar etc. having 360 villages in muttra area. all called perhaps phaujdars now, along with khuntelas (kauntels (kunti) of mahabharats fame)
 
Vinod.>>>LET US SEE RESEARCHERS

WHO ARE THEY...

Asko parpola

MAHADEVAN

Michael Weitzel

HUSSAN dhani

All these researchers are hiding their faces as their theory has f a llen flat on the ground Who else plz tell me
 
vinodji, u perhaps had a doubt when I wrote first about jat conquest of england

Do you still preserve those doubts? perhaps no longer? now it must be clear to you how lancashire (how come this lanca is there?) and hampshire was bastardised by jats/jutes in england.

I've posted u those proofs. rather they n e where on the net.
 
chinese chronicles on jats

are as old almost as their attack on egyptian civilization. and all synchronize at the same time with indus valley civilization. jats and all related aspects (like languages and races) till today preserved themselves as indo-european and euro-indian? that means india comes first and is the prime region.
 
Yeah I agree with you... my typo... and it was henga not hengi, again typo... ok.

vinod

sktewatia said:
vinodji, it was in 2600 bc perhaps n not in 600 bc. amorites (mor jats now in sonepat/later mauryas of asokas fame) who came from the land of djati, attacked it.
 
Ball is in yr court... First you prove how it was a jat civilization.... I said I don't disagree with fact... there are hundred of site bein excavated from during that period so certainly there was civilization which is continuing till now... but continuity is not un-interrupted... I just wanted to warn against stretching limit of making everybody in world jat jat jat...

-vinod

narenderkharb said:
Vinod
you still did not reply my question how you find INDUS VALLEY A NON JAT CIVILIZATION.

Which researcher you trust? let us see how much sound your researchers are?

Who according to you can be the inhabitant ?come on vinod if you belive some thing you must know the reason for that.
 
Last edited:
rakeshmalik said:
its gud some people understand what's there to understand. its natural that others thinks that they have copyrite on this site n jats.
for them, did u people know that there are lot of muslim jats in this world. i wudn't expect from you to know it.
that why i write that let discuss about jatland and not hindu or muslim.
if people think that muslimjats are not jats than there is somethimg really wrong with there logic and reason.
in pakistan's punjab a lot of muslim jats, if u want i can write the goatra also.
this site is jatland, which mean area for jats and it include jats from UK,Canada,Fiji,pakistan or anywhere from the world.


I think it is very clear the site is for Hindu jats only... Take it or LEAVE it!
 
Non-Relevant to the thread

PLEASE STICK TO THE THREAD'S SUBJECT....for these discussions there are so many other threads.....Bhawnao ko sahi jagah pe vyakt karenge to wo jyada jordar lageingi....please dont mind....

vinodks said:
Ball is in yr court... First you prove how it was a jat civilization.... I said I don't disagree with fact... there are hundred of site bein excavated from during that period so certainly there was civilization which is continuing till now... but continuity is not un-interrupted... I just wanted to warn against stretching limit of making everybody in world jat jat jat...

-vinod
 
Last edited:
re re matti???? Gagu=killki

Keshu siraf re re matti ni.....KHARAB MATTI=BIRAN MATTI=RE RE MATTI arr ispe meri kai gagu(killki):D :D :D :D RELLI GHEE v/s NOONI GHEE ka mukabla ho rya sai....IN RINGATAN MEIN....KODHI KITTE KE..KIMME SUTHRI TAI BATLAAN TAI RAHE....in ne tai nu bi na bera koonsi baat kis thread mein kehan ki sai....isne kehyan karein...apni-apni tumbdi apna apna raag
 
Last edited:
sunitahooda said:
Keshu siraf re re matti ni.....KHARAB MATTI=BIRAN MATTI=RE RE MATTI arr ispe meri kai gagu(killki)RELLI GHEE v/s NOONI GHEE ka mukabla ho rya sai....IN RINGATAN MEIN....KODHI KITTE KE..KIMME SUTHRI TAI BATLAAN TAI RAHE....in ne tai nu bi na bera koonso baat kis thread mein kehan ki sai....isne kehyan karein...apni-apni tumbdi apna apna raag

hahahahahaha..killkki pe killkki .....hahahahahaa mar ge re gagu gagu.........hahahaha:D:D:D:D...samajh mein aagi bebe dat jya dat jya......ek be hi samjh mein aa gi thi......biraan maati.......saari dhaal ki maati to tanne pitt di.........
ooooooooooooooooooo bhai rakesh malik, bhai yu ke kar diya tanne
issi thread kyan te post kardi marre batte..........hahahah je agar iss chorri ke kimme ho gya ne teri sodd si bhari jyaggi aare .......:mad:.....aadhi baawalli kardi tanne....hahahahahahahaha killkki ...hahaha:p
A request from bottom of my heart to all real jatlanders to please not comment on such controvertial posts. As this useless discussion leads us to nowhere becoz "what we are we are" and just like that no one can change the name.
its better not to comment rather than land up in chaos and start a heated discussion.

ya sunita te baawlli ho li aur berra na kittne honge......hahahaha
bebe to chinta na manne thik ho jya gi......killkki killkii gaggu gagu....;)
 
Quote>
A request from bottom of my heart to all real jatlanders to please not comment on such controvertial posts. As this useless discussion leads us to nowhere becoz
"what we are we are" and just like that no one can change the name.............




Thanks keshav for saying it,such unnessary thread are delebrately planted to create unneccesary controversy,which we are seeing for past some time.

The aim to start discussion here was just to divert attention from this avoidable topic,many members got it some could not.I FEEL SORRY FOR INCONVIENENCE TO THEM.
 
Hum to apni bhawnao ko parkat karna nahi chahte the lekin mujhe uksaya gaya tha... hum es thread ki maan-maryada ka samman karte hein lekin kisini jaton ki maan maryada se ched-khani karne hi koshish ki.... to hume majboori mein ye kadam uthana pada joki aapko ucheet nahi laga... abhi hum give-up karte hooye chupchap chale jaate hein... ab tumhare hawale ye thread sathiyo...

-vinod

sunitahooda said:
PLEASE STICK TO THE TREAD'S SUBJECT....for these discussions there are so many other threads.....Bhawnao ko sahi jagah pe vyakt karenge to wo jyada jordar lageingi....please dont mind....
 
ye toh wahi bat ho gayi ki soot naa kupas arr julahe kee saath lattham lattha.....;) :D

yar ye private web site hai ...jisne banayi hai uski bhee rai le lo....:D ;) akk uske bina pucchu hee naam change kar doge.....
 
Bhai, saare jaat eh kathhe ho jao, Hindu dharam ka to apne aap sudhar ho jyaga. Jat implies jaat i.e. Hindu jats only not even sikh jats otherwise the whole purpose of this site will be defeated. My votes for "Hindu JAATs ONLY" .
 
100% agree with you Keshav bhai. this kind of threads should be ignored.


A request from bottom of my heart to all real jatlanders to please not comment on such controvertial posts. As this useless discussion leads us to nowhere becoz "what we are we are" and just like that no one can change the name.
its better not to comment rather than land up in chaos and start a heated discussion.

ya sunita te baawlli ho li aur berra na kittne honge......hahahaha
bebe to chinta na manne thik ho jya gi......killkki killkii gaggu gagu....;)
[/QUOTE]
 
90% people were concern about 1 thing(changing name). i feel bad to say that it is nothing to do with name, but some other thing(1 is history of jats). lot of people said that it s 4 hindu jat. thats ok if they think so .nobody have prob with that. but these people have to show this warning that only hindu jat are allowed. but for other better check with editor?
 
Last edited:
bs ibb... kyu maran ney ho liya

rakeshmalik said:
90% people were concern about 1 thing(changing name). i feel bad to say that it is nothing to do with name, but some other thing(1 is history of jats). lot of people said that it s 4 hindu jat. thats ok if they think so .nobody have prob with that. but these people have to show this warning that only hindu jat are allowed. but for other better check with editor?
arey malik saab .... ib too taal kardey,,,, off kar dey iss spit blowing machine ney,,,,,,,,,,,,,,:p
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top