Why so much sympathy on Bangladesh??????????????

" Modi invited Taslim to come over to Gujarat. "

I need some help in understanding whats wrong here . Ab Zawahiri ko thode na karega invite .
Muslims se zyada phobia Hindus ko hai Modi ka ( seems to be ) .

" Imagine a Scenario "
Really......FB hai .....aur Chattis Hazar Social Sites hai phir bhi kasar reh gayee ....kuch imagine karne ki .

Humare yahan kehte hai , acha sochoge acha hi hoga so ......Try Imagining this Scenario " Rahul G Ji humare PM honge - Humara Neta kaisa ho Rahul Ji jaisa ho "
 
We view it by a complete different viewpoint because of better understanding of historic, strategic, internal security of India. We are a majority religion will form a government who will bow to us & grant refugee status with our consent & to showcase our hostile neighbors in a bad light . Understand!!!!
Our/ We? Who and what are we talking about here?

Better understanding of history? Don't make me laugh. I have seen your better understanding of history in other threads.

In some other thread by you, I read that million of Muslims or million of Hindu refugees causing problems & burden. Please provide some evidence like letter of Assam governor that million of Hindu refugees infiltrating & changing the demographics strategically, involved in violence with local community & involved in anti national activities.
The same source mentioned that demographics were changed by both Hindu and Muslim migration into Assam. Population jumpring unnaturally is a change. Its another matter that you wouldn't consider increase in Hindu demographics as a change at all, but not for others.

PS :- As per modern history we have seen muslims & sikhs involved in anti-national activities causing problem for India. ISI is very smart it uses Muslims & used Sikhs but could never use Hindus against India.
How do you know only Muslims and Sikhs were used by ISI? And I wouldn't worry about the ISI when our own internal activities cause enough damage and lead to anti-national activities.
 
Our/ We? Who and what are we talking about here?

How do you know only Muslims and Sikhs were used by ISI? And I wouldn't worry about the ISI when our own internal activities cause enough damage and lead to anti-national activities.

What are you talking? Muslims and Sikhs indulged in large scale religion based terrorism and it is an open secret that they were funded and aided by the ISI. Provide the proof of anybody else who has been funded and aided in India.

Don't make blanket statements without providing proof - No other community has ever indulged in religion based terrorism in India ever.
 
So have you started reading my posts before replying? Why this change of heart? BTW, I still don't think you can read my posts well. :)

What are you talking? Muslims and Sikhs indulged in large scale religion based terrorism and it is an open secret that they were funded and aided by the ISI. Provide the proof of anybody else who has been funded and aided in India.

I just don't count religion based terrorism as the only terrorism. There are many other kinds. Take the Naxal one for example. Reports say they have received foreign funds via Nepali Maoists - ISI - China.

Don't make blanket statements without providing proof - No other community has ever indulged in religion based terrorism in India ever.

Really? I guess riots and destruction of medieval monuments counts as harmless fun and games. Is that terrorism or not?
 
Where is the proof to all what have you said below while referring to funds being routed via Nepal to Maoists by ISI?

I expect you to stick to the topic or rather to the claim made by you.

So have you started reading my posts before replying? Why this change of heart? BTW, I still don't think you can read my posts well. :)



I just don't count religion based terrorism as the only terrorism. There are many other kinds. Take the Naxal one for example. Reports say they have received foreign funds via Nepali Maoists - ISI - China.



Really? I guess riots and destruction of medieval monuments counts as harmless fun and games. Is that terrorism or not?
 
Our/ We? Who and what are we talking about here?

Better understanding of history? Don't make me laugh. I have seen your better understanding of history in other threre

If we will start taking history lessons from you. It will be British sycophancy, Khalistan, religious terrorism, Seperatism, anti-national activities & now Pseudo-secularism. I am glad that I dont have better understanding of this type of history.

Keep laughing now.
 
If we will start taking history lessons from you. It will be British sycophancy, Khalistan, religious terrorism, Seperatism, anti-national activities & now Pseudo-secularism. I am glad that I dont have better understanding of this type of history.
There are no 'types' to history. History is history. Take that as your first free lesson.

Keep laughing now.

With your support, I will.
 
There are no 'types' to history. History is history. Take that as your first free lesson.

That is what I read. Muslim demading Pakistan on basis of religion , used direct action to massacre innocents & Sikhs demanding Khalistan on religious lines again massacre of innocents.

Both these communities have blot on themselves for anti national activities , Sikhs learned after operation bluestar & subsequent events but Muslims still need to learn .

Now what your education & community taught you about history can be shared here.

With your support, I will.

You may laugh, I will be obliged it is good for health.
 
History is not just history.

If you actually look into the history of history you will understand that history has been written by the ruling class and the same has been passed down ages as it was manufactured/cooked up.

History has all shades and colours. Provide proof that history has never been coloured/influenced by the influential and powerful people over the ages.

And yes, as Sumit has said you should laugh your heart out, it's good for health after all. But don't just make false assertions. Come out with the proofs.

There are no 'types' to history. History is history. Take that as your first free lesson.



With your support, I will.
 
Last edited:
We must not forget that there is something called :

1. Hindu Terrorism
2. Communal terrorism

as well.
hindu terrorism usually connotated by saffron terrorism.... India has huge challenge frm such right wing n fascist powers.... big threat to indian sovereignty posed by these communal forces........latest riots in mujjafarnagr were lit up by right wing communal forces to swing d votes..............we ve huge challenges going forward......bt since we r diverse n resilient community.......we can face these challenges easily.........we ve done it in the past.......it's not a new thing..........india will continue to grow stronger n more robust than ever before..........
 
In a secular democracy there should be no position for any kind of terrorism.
yes sir, i agree wid u.......secularism is a way to go..............after Babri Masjid incidence, right wing communal forces r becoming more powerful..that said, we still ve our democracy right...........n our constitution allows freedoms.........when we hv such institutions, we can still fight with these dangerous communal forces...........these communal tensions flare up every decade or so.........bt we can fight wid them together...
 
That is what I read. Muslim demading Pakistan on basis of religion , used direct action to massacre innocents & Sikhs demanding Khalistan on religious lines again massacre of innocents.

Both these communities have blot on themselves for anti national activities , Sikhs learned after operation bluestar & subsequent events but Muslims still need to learn .

Now what your education & community taught you about history can be shared here.

You must read more. That is all I have to say. Read about the causes from all angles. If you always read from one perspective, your understanding will be limited.

And there's no point going into the Khalistan issue here as you didn't pay heed to what I wrote in the Op Bluestar thread.
 
Any statement is proof enough for you to be credible.

Provide something which has been established. You just paste half baked truth/falsity which is posted on the internet after googling around for some time.

Did you read what was posted? So now you expect me to go meet the Naxals, ISI and Govt agencies myself to fetch you the proofs?
 
Did you read what was posted? So now you expect me to go meet the Naxals, ISI and Govt agencies myself to fetch you the proofs?

Definitely, the onus is on you to prove. Blabbering doesn't make any sense. If you want proof of militancy done by muslims & sikhs & links to ISI n foreign funding, i will provide you.
 
Back
Top