Creative Movies of all Times

Thanks for this! Saw the movie and was not disappointed. Quite liked the movie. Blame the name and not so high profile star cast that it failed to attract people as much.

Pretty much felt like I’m watching a movie of 70s which was actually incredible. This Neil dude, though needs to groom a bit more on acting front, but had done a decent job (not to mention how cool …no no...wait …how hot he looks..;)).

And I totally agree with you, had it been Saif, the movie could have made among the top ones of the year..true!

Aaj kal aap mujhse bohot zyada agree kar rahi hain. Aapki tabiyat to theek hai ("Knock on the wood") ;):p:p.
 
It is really unfortunate that a movie like this one bombs at the BO with few taking a notice it while others -- bullshit served in the name of motion pictures and I am referring to the likes of Partner, Heyy Baby and that HR's...I forgot its name et al -- go on to become "blockbusters".

Move over Chak de (nothing to take away from it. An inspirational flick!), in Johhny Gaddar, we have the best flick of the year thus far. An out and out thriller that keeps you on the edge of your seat most of time, in fact, all the time.

The movie is about an underworld deal gone awry when a gang member ditches others and decides to take it all.

Eh Hasina thi, showed Sriram Raghvan knows how to make a movie, a brilliant movie, I mean, and in JG he has just raised the bar. Too early to say but it seems he's Bollywood's answer to well...Alfred Hitchcock.

And it is not just the direction, acting and cinematography as well are equally compelling. And the way Raghvan has connected events is just superb, a la Quentin Tatantino.

The only part which comes as a cropper is the film's protagonist. Contrary to many a film reviewers who has waxed eloquent on Neil Mukhesh, the debutant thespian needs to hone is acting skills a lot. If only Sriram would've cast Saif Ali Khan instead.

The rest have done a wonderful job. Dharam paaji is good, but Vinay Pathak is great.

A piece of advice: Things don't make much sense in the first half an hour so don't jump the gun and leave the hall. 'Coz you won't know what you've missed.

Now After seeing the movie.. I am sure you were paid to write this review.
Very slow pace movie... nothing to hold ... only tht the end reminded me of "Kaante"... which was a much better movie.. no similarity except everyone dies in the end,, n no one gets the money.
 
Now After seeing the movie.. I am sure you were paid to write this review.
Very slow pace movie... nothing to hold ... only tht the end reminded me of "Kaante"... which was a much better movie.. no similarity except everyone dies in the end,, n no one gets the money.

You're still outnumbered by 1 is to 3 (my paid review included:p:D). On Kaante, I would've been on your side if it had an element of originality.
 
Hi Sanjay

I have seen chronicles of narnia. Do you program for movies or other stuff? Tell me something, is 'family guy' programmed or sketched?

Also folks back home..do they show family guy on tv there?

Priti


hello priti

have u seen

polar express
final fantacy
narnia

i am a 3d animation and video game programmer

thanx
 
Secondhand Lions

Saw this gem of a movie by fluke as it is a typical 'diamond-tucked-away-in-the-movie-shelves' kinds...

Believe me, "Secondhand Lions" is one of those movies that you come across by mistake (and some misgivings and cynicisim, since you have obviously never heard of the name) and walk away after viewing with a pleasant surprise and a warm, feel-good heart!

It is what I would call one of those coming of age for a kid kinda movies, that keeps you glued to the screen with a smile on your face throughout!
Has some powerhouse actors doing their thing in the most unassuming way....

The movie's central character is a kid (Haley Joel Osment; remember the kid who saw dead people in Night Shyamalan's 'Sixth Sense'?) and his two uncles Robert Duvall and Michael Caine [I mean geez people, I could just stop here on the review after mentioning those two names and that would be enough.... those two big guys star in this movie??? Yup, and boy do they scorch the screen with their performances as the two aging but fiesty uncles to the over-awed kid!]...

I recommend this movie to anyone, it's a total full blooded awesome movie... loved it!

Go look for it in your fav movie rental stores! (It's a year 2003 movie...)
 
A fine film!

“What! You haven’t seen teen deewarein?!!” He quipped and I, on the other end of the line, listened to him clueless as if I missed seeing Taj while in Agra...;):D Yeah yeah, you guessed it right. I’m talking about “Teen Deewarein” by Nagesh Kukunoor. And now when I’m done watching the movie, I can say that my head is nodding in consent when this friend of mine who ranked it as the best movie so far by Nagesh Kukunoor. Welll, thanks for recommending..:)

Well, this Kukunoor guy has a unique style of making films and has produced movies which stand apart from the usual Bollywood stuff. So coming to 3 deewarein, which now I too consider his best so far, is a movie which revolves around 3 prisoners (played by Nasiruddin Shah, Jackie Schroff and Nagesh himself) who have been convicted for murder and sentenced to death penalty. All three are totally different human beings, thinking in their own way, belonging to different cultures and different strata of society but what is incredible here is how these three are connected and how their stories are linked which starts to unfold when a documentary maker (played by Juhi Chawala) emerges in the scene. So, that’s the overview of the plot. Watch it yourself, don’t wanna spoil the thrill.

Talking about direction, at times I felt like I’m watching a Hollywood movie, I swear! The suspense and thrill is maintained till the very end and the movie succeeds in creating that stir so profusely that I ended up branding the movie “disturbing”! But hey, this is what is beautiful. It is an achievement of the whole idea that movie was made keeping in mind. So, imagine how wonderfully the movie is done. It generates all the emotions it is meant to generate. And like a good complete movie, when you are done watching it there is this satisfying feeling and a sense of fulfillment.

Wonderful script! Acting was superb. Nasiruddin Shah, as always, was fantastically fabulous. Nagesh, himself, did a brilliant job as a common hyderbadi naïve guy. His diction for hindi with that typical hyderabadi accent is an added zing for his role. Jackie Shroff did full justice to his character of a serious quiet lawyer. Juhi looked very charming and played her character amazingly.

On a side note, I think I’m getting into a practice of connecting more than one movies, but it aint it nice in a way, a more global perspective and guess I should start another thread “Comparative analysis of creative movies”...:D …ok ok..coming to the point I was trying to make.

I wanted to draw your attention to Alejandro González Iñárritu, a Mexican filmmaker, here. If you have seen his movies you would know where I’m coming from and what I intend to say here. His style, generally, is also connecting 2-3 stories into a film. I would call his movies as films rather than calling movies. Why this nomenclature? I figured movie is a compelete story (I emphasize story) perhaps with some kind of message and a film is not a complete story per se and its almost touching the documentry style, well we can say a film ends where a documentry starts.
Lets say, Mainstream cinema=movie and Artsy cinema=films. So, with that in mind, now this filmmaker too has this typical style of making a film out of 3-4 different stories but containing some connecting link.

Amores Perros (a mexican film) was one of my all time fav by him, where he so wonderfully connects 3 stories and Babel (I know it has its own hate club on this thread..:(:D) again was a fusion of 4 diff stories but connecting with each other and in fact Babel was more global and more complete a film, I felt, as it depicted stories of people who never met in their lives and also, was setup in different time frames.

Alright…….enough of Comparative analysis. Coming to 3 deewarein, if you are a lover of fine artsy kind of cinema, you should watch it. Over and out...:)
 
happened to see a Jodie foster flick recently....called..."The Brave one"

as usual.....she is one amazing actress and its all about how in the process of defending hr she starts killing the crime in wild streets of NYC....

wud recommend at least one go
 
“What! You haven’t seen teen deewarein?!!” He quipped and I, on the other end of the line, listened to him clueless as if I missed seeing Taj while in Agra...;):D Yeah yeah, you guessed it right. I’m talking about “Teen Deewarein” by Nagesh Kukunoor. And now when I’m done watching the movie, I can say that my head is nodding in consent when this friend of mine who ranked it as the best movie so far by Nagesh Kukunoor. Welll, thanks for recommending..:)

Well, this Kukunoor guy has a unique style of making films and has produced movies which stand apart from the usual Bollywood stuff. So coming to 3 deewarein, which now I too consider his best so far, is a movie which revolves around 3 prisoners (played by Nasiruddin Shah, Jackie Schroff and Nagesh himself) who have been convicted for murder and sentenced to death penalty. All three are totally different human beings, thinking in their own way, belonging to different cultures and different strata of society but what is incredible here is how these three are connected and how their stories are linked which starts to unfold when a documentary maker (played by Juhi Chawala) emerges in the scene. So, that’s the overview of the plot. Watch it yourself, don’t wanna spoil the thrill.

Talking about direction, at times I felt like I’m watching a Hollywood movie, I swear! The suspense and thrill is maintained till the very end and the movie succeeds in creating that stir so profusely that I ended up branding the movie “disturbing”! But hey, this is what is beautiful. It is an achievement of the whole idea that movie was made keeping in mind. So, imagine how wonderfully the movie is done. It generates all the emotions it is meant to generate. And like a good complete movie, when you are done watching it there is this satisfying feeling and a sense of fulfillment.

Wonderful script! Acting was superb. Nasiruddin Shah, as always, was fantastically fabulous. Nagesh, himself, did a brilliant job as a common hyderbadi naïve guy. His diction for hindi with that typical hyderabadi accent is an added zing for his role. Jackie Shroff did full justice to his character of a serious quiet lawyer. Juhi looked very charming and played her character amazingly.

On a side note, I think I’m getting into a practice of connecting more than one movies, but it aint it nice in a way, a more global perspective and guess I should start another thread “Comparative analysis of creative movies”...:D …ok ok..coming to the point I was trying to make.

I wanted to draw your attention to Alejandro González Iñárritu, a Mexican filmmaker, here. If you have seen his movies you would know where I’m coming from and what I intend to say here. His style, generally, is also connecting 2-3 stories into a film. I would call his movies as films rather than calling movies. Why this nomenclature? I figured movie is a compelete story (I emphasize story) perhaps with some kind of message and a film is not a complete story per se and its almost touching the documentry style, well we can say a film ends where a documentry starts.
Lets say, Mainstream cinema=movie and Artsy cinema=films. So, with that in mind, now this filmmaker too has this typical style of making a film out of 3-4 different stories but containing some connecting link.

Amores Perros (a mexican film) was one of my all time fav by him, where he so wonderfully connects 3 stories and Babel (I know it has its own hate club on this thread..:(:D) again was a fusion of 4 diff stories but connecting with each other and in fact Babel was more global and more complete a film, I felt, as it depicted stories of people who never met in their lives and also, was setup in different time frames.

Alright…….enough of Comparative analysis. Coming to 3 deewarein, if you are a lover of fine artsy kind of cinema, you should watch it. Over and out...:)

Curiously, even I'd mentioned it as Kukunoor's best thus far, somewhere in this thread. Maybe your friend read my review over here and reproduced it, without my consent, infront of you.:p

However, one thing your friend might not have known is that the flick in its initial part is somewhat inspired by The Shawshank Redemption. However, both the movie have different stings in the tail. I would recommend you, if you haven't, watch this movie as well.
 
Believe me, "Secondhand Lions" is one of those movies that you come across by mistake (and some misgivings and cynicisim, since you have obviously never heard of the name) and walk away after viewing with a pleasant surprise and a warm, feel-good heart!

Tempted to watch now, after this review..:)
 
I watched 'BHUL BHULLIYA' last night.
Thats a different movie ! Educating for lot of people who believe in 'bhoot-pret' (if they understand it) and it was actually a horror movie which makes sense.
 
I watched 'BHUL BHULLIYA' last night.
Thats a different movie ! Educating for lot of people who believe in 'bhoot-pret' (if they understand it) and it was actually a horror movie which makes sense.

If people can learn from movies, then educating tak theek hai BB.
But I was pretty disappointed with this movie. Barring Akshay (and yeah Paresh at times) rest of them especially Vidya Balan, were pathetic in acting. Don’t know whats going wrong with Vidya Balan, she was superb in Parineeta and Munnbhai but lately in Hey Baby and BB, she was just so weak.

Anyway, besides all this, there was a glitch in the movie I found. If you recall there was this lady in their family who lost her voice long time back apparently on seeing a ghost. Now my hitch here is if it was all coz of Vidya Balan’s psychic issue then how come that lady lost her voice in past when Vidya Balan was no where in the scene. Does it mean that there was a real ghost there at that time? Don’t know..I would rate this movie 5 on 10.
 
In present time film makers r just making movies without any moral or sm teaching to young gen.

RANG DE BASANTI is surely a movie which is meaningful n fill us with patriotism.
 
Haven't seen this one...nonetheless, I think commercially successful movies can be pretty creative too :-) fifty percent or more movies discussed here are probably commercially successful. Anyway, there is no hard and fast rule of discussing any particular type of movies...people will have different parameters of what is creative and what is not...so although I'm speaking for everyone here but we all just post about whatever movies appeal to us...so fairly broad discussion...good thing is people might chance to hear about movies that they dont know otherwise and see something really nice...:)



have any
where would you guys rate a commercial success like VAASTAV on creativity parameters ...
 
where would you guys rate a commercial success like VAASTAV on creativity parameters ...

A good movie, Sanjay Dutt was brilliant (give him a Bhai's role, and he'll breath life into the character) however, I wouldn't use the word 'creative' to describe the flick.

If at all their was any creative movie about the Mumbai mafia, it was Satya. To date, this remains the best movie to have come out of Ramu's Factory. In fact that was time when RGV didn't embark on a mass production drive and still believed that quality mattered much more than quantity.

Back to the question you've raised, Vaastav even wasn't that big a commercial hit has it was projected to be.

Just because a movie is making money in the Mumbai/maharashtra circle, it can't be called a nation-wide hit. You'd surpised to know that Sunny Deol's Indian (a third-rate bullshit) made more money than Dil Chahta Hai.
 
Back
Top