1)If you meant that among those few teachers from RC lets add a few more Jats from RC then think again....well to be precise less number of incompetents(teachers from RC) will harm in lesser quantity....more will haram more....so if because of such incompetent teachers 30 percent of students dont get good education then lets not make it say 40 percent or 50 percent by giving more incompetent(Jats in RC)
2)Same is the case with doctors....lets not add more numbers of incompetent doctors keeping the life of patients at stake....aapke kehne ka yeh matlab hai ki agar dusre log gandgi machaye toh hum log peeche kyu rahe....we should also help them and mess up in better way
3)In such positions where one doesn't need to have specific skills or knowledge there we can have more candidates from RC....but ofcourse demanding for RC for jats is not the right solution.
2)Same is the case with doctors....lets not add more numbers of incompetent doctors keeping the life of patients at stake....aapke kehne ka yeh matlab hai ki agar dusre log gandgi machaye toh hum log peeche kyu rahe....we should also help them and mess up in better way
3)In such positions where one doesn't need to have specific skills or knowledge there we can have more candidates from RC....but ofcourse demanding for RC for jats is not the right solution.
1) Will we deny to study in govt. schools as there are teachers from reserved categories?
2) Will we deny to doctors from reserved categories in PGI rohtak as they will be the doctors ultimatly getting reservation again at PG level and then in jobs at the same PGI?
3) Will we deny to process our works in govt depts as there are reserved category officers?
4) Will we deny to take help from police as the officers there are too from reserved categories?
5) Will we deny to travel in a bus with reserved category driver?
I appreciate yours positive attitude. But what does the increasing seats for general quota means? How will you acheive this, please put your thoughts as what for common general category man should fight for thinking practically?