Hockey world cup commonwealth teh pehlem.. uska bhi kuch japtaha bando....
Pakistan uwe dukhi hoo raha hai.. adde bathere Lashkar alle hande hain..
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/photo-gallery/gallery-e6frf94x-1225826066463?page=1
Workers at Commonwealth Games sites an exploited lot: Panel
In a big embarrassment to the Centre and Delhi government ahead of the Commonwealth Games, a committee appointed by the Delhi High Court has said that workers at Games-related construction sites were not being paid minimum wages and were being made to work overtime for no extra money.
And interesting lines....
The high court panel members could not access sites under the control of DIAL and DMRC to check if workers at Games-related construction sites were not exploited due to security reasons, the report said. Respondents in the PIL include the Union and Delhi governments, NDMC and Sports Authority of India.
May be fears of Al qaeda..
You really think those kids are on payroll? They are surely kids of the laborers working on site, playing in there. Someone took their fotos and portrayed them as child laborer. Just an unprofessional act on the part of journalist as well as newspaper.
I believe they are a part of exploited workforce. On a worksite, who should be allowed? (1)Workers (2) Contractors/Builders (3) Supervising Authority (4) Government Authority.
If some one else is present on a worksite without any purpose means workplace safety laws are not in place. What if that kid playing over there fall in a borewell. That kid does not know about any work safety and nor his parents. What about occupational health and safety. The dust that kid would be inhaling .You will not find any kid on a work site in any of the developed country. This is a Government responsibility to make sure that all work safety laws are in place.
It is India. Any developing country for that matter dont have very strict norms for a construction worksite. There is nothing wrong in that, where do you think these laborers will leave their kids? You go to any brick klin in India and you will find entire family working there. Any construction site and you will see laborers living there along with their family in temporary shelters they create. We can not just compare everything with developed country as we are NOT a developed country yet. In a developed country even a construction worker comes to work site in a car, in our country they can not think beyond a bi-cycle. In a developed country kids get sick when exposed slightly to dirt, dust, pollution. That does not happen in India. Kids adapt and immune system is very strong. India never claimed herself as a country without poors, now for these foreigners this visuals are something which they can not understand.
It is India. Any developing country for that matter dont have very strict norms for a construction worksite. There is nothing wrong in that, where do you think these laborers will leave their kids? You go to any brick klin in India and you will find entire family working there. Any construction site and you will see laborers living there along with their family in temporary shelters they create. We can not just compare everything with developed country as we are NOT a developed country yet. In a developed country even a construction worker comes to work site in a car, in our country they can not think beyond a bi-cycle. In a developed country kids get sick when exposed slightly to dirt, dust, pollution. That does not happen in India. Kids adapt and immune system is very strong. India never claimed herself as a country without poors, now for these foreigners this visuals are something which they can not understand.
Not being a developed country does not mean child labor/not going to school is ok. The problem is that everybody says its ok because chalta hai etc etc. People need to draw the line somewhere. I never hire anybody who bring their children to work - maid etc.
every now and then, we come back to the same sick attitude... "sab chalta hai". that's where the problem lies. apart from a common men, the govt. too is equally responsible.Essentially those construction workers should be provided with sturdy helmets, gumboots or other necessary safeguards. When a tender of this construction project was passed, there would have been some estimated money of the project. That estimated money also considers contractor’s expenditure in providing safe guards to the workers involved in the project. But workers have not been provided the safety guards by the contractor. Because it costs a contractor to pay for those safety guards. Forget about other safety concerns. If that is included in work safety, the contractor would lose profits out of that project. After all contractor has to pay to corrupt bureaucrats some margins because they helped him to get this tender .And the common Indian mentality says, who cares.
You really think those kids are on payroll? They are surely kids of the laborers working on site, playing in there. Someone took their fotos and portrayed them as child laborer. Just an unprofessional act on the part of journalist as well as newspaper.
Journalism at its abysmal lows. I think a toddler worker was missing from the "slideshow". Maybe they could have photographed a 9 month old kid, walking "ghudaliya", and moving one stone at a time from one place to another.
That these kids are there on the construction site or safety equipment is not provided to workers are absolute wrongs in my opinion. No arguments about that. But doesn't mean that you get some poor kids to pose for the camera and then put a caption suggesting they are child laborer- "Indian children work near to their parents at a construction project in front of the Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium in New Delhi, India."
@Kapil. Check pic 9 and 13..You will find a hint of child labour
In a developed country even a construction worker comes to work site in a car, in our country they can not think beyond a bi-cycle.
You have also raised a point that foreign labourers have more affordability than Indians. Reason is that most of the Indians are being paid very low. They are exploited by employers, working overtime with no money. Obviously they would not have any affordability.
Your above lines suggest that how ignorant Indians are? And you are basically defending Indian corrupt system. If you go through some of those pictures, you will find that women working on site didn't have safeguard. Essentially those construction workers should be provided with sturdy helmets, gumboots or other necessary safeguards.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.