J
jitendersingh
Guest
Dear All,
The discussion is getting more and more motivating for me as I saw the increasing number of participants in it.
Really getting to what people think of such an issue and with what spirit always motivates you. Maybe I am from the minority (probably only one who is holding the stance against you ALL) but then the spirit has always encouraged to put up my views.
Putting my views on the latest postings.
Ramesh Lakra Bhai, I am not emphasizing that whether anybody has seen the God or not. My view is that if God is there, then why?
When we hypothesize, let God is there. God is only one. (everybody agrees to this!) Then why do Hindus say that there should be Mandir in Ayodhya. A Maszid is also a place of worshipping God. Only difference is the name by which we worship. Then why the destruction of maszid for building mandir?
I am really convinced that you will be using your wits to reply this. I have again used the term Hypothesis because I still am not being able to convince myself for so called meditation, unless I am convinced to the basics of the issue.
The core issue is again faith. I do believe that nature is the supreme force of the universe, and abiding by the natural laws learnt in my surrounding define my moral stand.
Again coming to the issue of atma. The soul of an individual is the reflection of the environment he has been brought up rather than an entity which as per your beliefs is static. That is why if two newly born babies are brought up in different environment they will have different moral standards. If a boy is brought up in an arya samaji environment, he will hate eating meat etc., but if the same is brought up in the areas where meat is a daily meal, he wouldn't consider it a sin.
If you think that believing in God is the sole objective of one's life and else it is a sin, I am doing this sin for last 10 years or so, and I am sure I have never put my head or my stand down by any standard even in a society dominated by the God-believing people.
Budh ji, I agree everything can't be argues by logic or science, otherwise the life would be too much complex. And that is where we go by convention.
In your example, what if the friend met, insisted, but the passenger still went up with his journey and dies. Was it the fault of the friend the he let him die. Please don't say that the person was bound to die, friend could not do anything.
Sheorayan Ji, again kudos for maintaining the spirit of an positive debate. It is always the requirement of each and every event to bring out something concrete. Infact for me results are subjective personally, but I would really like anybody to bring out summary of the discussion atleast each week.
But again I argue against the last line. Why need the so called Gurus. I know for me what is right and what is wrong. You know what is right and what is wrong. Everybody participating in does know what they do mean, when they are writing. It is simply a matter of learning from each other. The same spirit should imply to the society as well. The so called Guru are only milking their own interests out of people's faith.
The discussion is getting more and more motivating for me as I saw the increasing number of participants in it.
Really getting to what people think of such an issue and with what spirit always motivates you. Maybe I am from the minority (probably only one who is holding the stance against you ALL) but then the spirit has always encouraged to put up my views.
Putting my views on the latest postings.
Ramesh Lakra Bhai, I am not emphasizing that whether anybody has seen the God or not. My view is that if God is there, then why?
When we hypothesize, let God is there. God is only one. (everybody agrees to this!) Then why do Hindus say that there should be Mandir in Ayodhya. A Maszid is also a place of worshipping God. Only difference is the name by which we worship. Then why the destruction of maszid for building mandir?
I am really convinced that you will be using your wits to reply this. I have again used the term Hypothesis because I still am not being able to convince myself for so called meditation, unless I am convinced to the basics of the issue.
The core issue is again faith. I do believe that nature is the supreme force of the universe, and abiding by the natural laws learnt in my surrounding define my moral stand.
Again coming to the issue of atma. The soul of an individual is the reflection of the environment he has been brought up rather than an entity which as per your beliefs is static. That is why if two newly born babies are brought up in different environment they will have different moral standards. If a boy is brought up in an arya samaji environment, he will hate eating meat etc., but if the same is brought up in the areas where meat is a daily meal, he wouldn't consider it a sin.
If you think that believing in God is the sole objective of one's life and else it is a sin, I am doing this sin for last 10 years or so, and I am sure I have never put my head or my stand down by any standard even in a society dominated by the God-believing people.
Budh ji, I agree everything can't be argues by logic or science, otherwise the life would be too much complex. And that is where we go by convention.
In your example, what if the friend met, insisted, but the passenger still went up with his journey and dies. Was it the fault of the friend the he let him die. Please don't say that the person was bound to die, friend could not do anything.
Sheorayan Ji, again kudos for maintaining the spirit of an positive debate. It is always the requirement of each and every event to bring out something concrete. Infact for me results are subjective personally, but I would really like anybody to bring out summary of the discussion atleast each week.
But again I argue against the last line. Why need the so called Gurus. I know for me what is right and what is wrong. You know what is right and what is wrong. Everybody participating in does know what they do mean, when they are writing. It is simply a matter of learning from each other. The same spirit should imply to the society as well. The so called Guru are only milking their own interests out of people's faith.